OG11-45

charlie6989

    

According
to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing
confidence that the economy will avoid the recession that many had
feared earlier in the year and instead come in for a "soft landing,"
followed by a gradual increase in business activity.
(A)    that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come
(B)    in the economy to avoid the recession, what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come
(C)    in the economy's ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared, and instead to come
(D)    in the economy to avoid the recession many were fearing earlier in the year, and rather to come
(E)    that the economy will avoid the recession that was feared earlier this year by many, with it instead coming

Ans:A

對於正確答案沒問題
想請問
B the economy to avoid the recession is awkward and unclear;是因為子句比較好嗎？？
E with it instead coming is awkward, wordy, and ungrammatical 為何會有文法上的錯誤？？
D除了時態問題  , and rather to come 為何不可 和 to avoid 平行
THX

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-28 14:36:43编辑过]

dianecarton

B笨拙企且指代不清 拿what指代，不清楚是指代recession还是前面整个句子,unclear;rather to come的主语是谁也不明确,unclear;而且跟A比较B的句子结构明显笨拙,awkward

E笨拙，啰嗦，不符合语法规范  with加独立主格结构一定错，因此ungrammatical，而且前面的那个被动语态的限制性定语从句没有主动语态的A优,awkward and wordy。

回答完毕

charlie6989

可是
在白勇語法上 的確有wiht 獨立主格的用法
with + n. + -ed/ing形式; with + n. + adj.; with + n. + 介詞短語 作狀語修飾前一個分句的動作類型詞
為何會是一定錯呢？？

charlie6989

ding

melody2121

b.rather do/rather doing的两个用法，没有rather to do的结构．what实质上引导这个这个从句有点插入语的意思，what有可以跳越修饰的作用，所以，它所指代的对象就不如that明确．

d.也是我错的项．除了上面讲的rather用法错误以外，它还错在同位语修饰上．recession后面直接加了many were fearing．．．，是一个同位语修饰前面名词．可是这里后面的是个同位语从句，所以必须加上关联词that．

e.它的结构其实不算错，只是，白勇上说了主动优先原则和分词结构修饰优先原则，让它不具有优先选择性．

charlie6989

b.rather do/rather doing的两个用法，没有rather to do的结构．what实质上引导这个这个从句有点插入语的意思，what有可以跳越修饰的作用，所以，它所指代的对象就不如that明确．

d.也是我错的项．除了上面讲的rather用法错误以外，它还错在同位语修饰上．recession后面直接加了many were fearing．．．，是一个同位语修饰前面名词．可是这里后面的是个同位语从句，所以必须加上关联词that．

同位语结构不是一定 ,................., 没有逗号可以吗？？

e.它的结构其实不算错，只是，白勇上说了主动优先原则和分词结构修饰优先原则，让它不具有优先选择性．

后来看看 E 后面with 修饰 似乎有修饰不清 且 it也指代不清


感谢你的回覆

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-7 20:39:15编辑过]

Jmelon

还有两个问题，

B选项OG中说：the economy to avoid the recession is awkward and unclear.为什么？

E选项：with it instead coming is awkward,wordy and ungrammatical.为什么？

希望各位帮忙解答~

AlienX

不一定是OG想說的:
- B: reflect something to do something中的to do something如果是修reflect, 那是reflect的表目的, 不對; 如果是想修the economy, economy怎去avoid the recession =.=||
- E: it指代不清.  "with"是非常flexible的preposition, 能免則免, 因為它的功能太多, 很容易有ambiguity...可是不要看到with就cross out...