看到前辈们2年多前的讨论,还是忍不住说一下自己看法,希望后来人批判,继续讨论,对bigcamel GG的看法我有赞同有批判: 1. 先说说我依据的语法点(与bigcamel GG依据相同): so that既可以引导目的状语从句,也可以引导结果状语从句; so that"以便,为了",引导一个表示目的的状语从句,此时可与in order that换用;从句谓语中常用情态动词may / might,can /could,should,would等;主从句间连接紧凑,没有逗号相隔。例: My old father began to study computer at the age of sixty so that(=in order that) he might keep up with times. so that"因此,所以",引导一个表示结果的状语从句,此时不能与in order that换用;从句中谓语根据需要使用相应的时态,主从句间可有逗号相隔。本文开头所列举例句中的so that就是这种用法。又如: She had not planned her time well,so that she did not finish her homework on time. 2. 联系OG 67和171(不同意bigcamel GG):我认为67和171题都表示目的,此时so that和in order that可以换用,但确实ETS为in order that 所在的选项都设置了其他错误,67和171的错误是相同的,就是:从句谓语中常用情态动词may / might,can /could,should,would等,而 OG67 (C) provide workers with unpaid leave in order that they 中没有情态动词,自然与 (D) to provide workers with unpaid leave so that they can 相比不是最佳选项;
至于OG171 OG已解释过了would is incorrect, 不如could
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-9 17:36:36编辑过] |