对照og,自己打分4,感觉og上的5分作文还是写得很好的,是真的paraphrase出来了, 自我感觉最大问题就是语言变化少,基本听力阅读上怎么说的就怎么写了,诚求大家狠拍!
og最后的练习题
The lecture introduces some most recent observations and researches of the meerkat behavior and other explanation of human' organs donation, and thus contradict the reading passage's opinion of praising these behavior as altruism. First of all, according the cutting-edge research presented in the lecture, the close observation reveals that the sentinel meerkats have eaten food before they provide standing guards for the group. That means they are standing there with a full stomach, this goes directly against the reading passage, which suggest the sentinel meerkats sacrifice their opportunity to eat while the others eat. In addition, the meerkat standing outside are in fact safer than the eating ones, since they usually possess an advantage place to escape, and after receiving alarm the eating ones gather to move about actually draw more attention of the predator, and thus the sentinel meerkats have a better chance to escape. All of these observation cast doubt on the reading passage's explanation of the standing guard behavior. When it comes to human being, the lecture summarizes many nonmaterial rewards people gain from seemingly altruism behavior. For example, by donating a kidney to a family member or stranger, people gain social appreciation and self-respect. It is more important to some people than money or material rewards. So it is unjustified to say that the donator gain nothing from this noble act as the reading passage.
|