ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1618|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

小作文习作,求拍~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-31 16:38:00 | 只看该作者

小作文习作,求拍~

对照og,自己打分4,感觉og上的5分作文还是写得很好的,是真的paraphrase出来了,
自我感觉最大问题就是语言变化少,基本听力阅读上怎么说的就怎么写了,诚求大家狠拍!

og最后的练习题

    

The lecture introduces some most recent
observations and researches of the meerkat behavior and other explanation of
human' organs donation, and thus contradict the reading passage's opinion of praising
these behavior as altruism.


    

First of all, according the cutting-edge
research presented in the lecture, the close observation reveals that the
sentinel meerkats have eaten food before they provide standing guards for the
group. That means they are standing there with a full stomach, this goes
directly against the reading passage, which suggest the sentinel meerkats
sacrifice their opportunity to eat while the others eat. In addition, the
meerkat standing outside are in fact safer than the eating ones, since they
usually possess an advantage place to escape, and after receiving alarm the
eating ones gather to move about actually draw more attention of the predator,
and thus the sentinel meerkats have a better chance to escape. All of these
observation cast doubt on the reading passage's explanation of the standing
guard behavior.


    

When it comes to human being, the lecture
summarizes many nonmaterial rewards people gain from seemingly altruism
behavior. For example, by donating a kidney to a family member or stranger,
people gain social appreciation and self-respect. It is more important to some
people than money or material rewards. So it is unjustified to say that the
donator gain nothing from this noble act as the reading passage.


    
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-3 05:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部