ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as China's giant pandas.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 9727|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道prep难题,大家看看,一起分析下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-20 20:50:00 | 只看该作者

一道prep难题,大家看看,一起分析下

165.   (33893-!-item-!-188;#058&007190)

 

 

Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as
                China's giant pandas.

 

 

(A) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as 
            

(B) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, researchers have determined, making them many times more rare than

(C) There are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined, which makes the leopards many times more rare compared to

(D) Researchers have determined that, because of being poached and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, thus making them many more times as rare as

(E) Researchers have determined that, because of poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times more rare than

a small question on the Official answer E

Why dont use "being poached" as D does?

It is obvious that the leopard is poached.

Many thanks

不知道如何下手,due to 、because of这两种不好的结构都有;their修饰不清的情况也都有,不知道怎么判断了???

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-21 14:35:00 | 只看该作者

d

这题没人答么??我觉得不知道从哪里下手做啊

板凳
发表于 2008-7-21 15:53:00 | 只看该作者

个人觉得D的问题有很多:

1。because of后面只能接名词性结构,being poached 不能看成是名词结构吧;而且poached用被动意义上感觉也不妥(这里强调的是poach这个动作本身带来的结果,而不是强调被poached这个行为);

2。thus是adv,不能代替conj连接句子;

3。making没有使动者,谁在make?

地板
发表于 2008-7-21 16:27:00 | 只看该作者

C也不对。WHICH 不能指代前面的全部

我是菜鸟,我说说,D,E看见BECAUSE OF直接就否了


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-21 16:57:41编辑过]
5#
发表于 2008-7-21 16:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用x_vampire在2008-7-21 16:27:00的发言:

C

我是菜鸟,我说说,DE看见BECAUSE OF直接就否了


C 不仅run-on,而且意思混乱,应该第一个被干掉的阿;because of也有正确的时候,不是优先度很高的判断标准。个人意见,继续讨论
6#
发表于 2008-7-22 08:01:00 | 只看该作者

(B) (D) "making them..." 修飾對象不清。
一般出現Ving 修飾對象通常是作為前置N.之 modifier 或是前面整句話的動作(如OG11 Q43, OG11 Q71),但此處顯然無法如此解釋。排除。
(D) 之比較表達(many more times...)有誤

(C) which 應指代名詞(而緊鄰於前者並非N.,已經是錯誤選項的徵兆了),則根據就近指代原則,其修飾對象為 researchers,邏輯不通。何況(C)的比較表達有誤(more ... compared to)

如此則剩下選項(A)(E),考慮其表達倍數方式均可,此兩者主要差別在引導"原因"之介詞片語之位置不同。由句意邏輯判斷,此原因是修飾"there are fewer than ..." 而不是修飾 "researchers have determined taat...",故排除(A)而選(E)。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-22 8:15:31编辑过]
7#
发表于 2008-7-22 08:08:00 | 只看该作者

In chioce D, more times as rare as is not idiomatic. we can say more times than other than more times as ...as.

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-22 14:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用youyou3941在2008-7-20 20:50:00的发言:

165.   (33893-!-item-!-188;#058&007190)

 

 

 

Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as
    China's giant pandas.

 

 

 

(A) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined that there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times as rare as 
   

(B) Due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, researchers have determined, making them many times more rare than  这里researchers have determined可以看成是插入语了,making直接跟在wild后面有修饰歧义

(C) There are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild due to poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, researchers have determined, which makes the leopards many times more rare compared to 同上,而且more和compared连用不对

(D) Researchers have determined that, because of being poached and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, thus making them many more times as rare as    末尾making有修饰determined的歧义

(E) Researchers have determined that, because of poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times more rare than

重新分析了下,说点我的看法。至于A,我是在排除不了了,还请nn们再看看吧!

9#
发表于 2008-7-22 15:11:00 | 只看该作者
poaching在这里是名词,和后面的cultivation并列。
A的话肯定是不对的,due to paching and cultivation, leopards减少了,而不是due to poaching and cultivation,researchers 才决定leopards少了,因此A这样的结构翻译下来的意思是因为捕猎和耕种,研究者发现blablabla。。。。
10#
发表于 2009-3-2 08:43:00 | 只看该作者
E 中的 their 指代很值得研究
(E)
Researchers have determined that, because of poaching and increased
cultivation in their native habitats, there are fewer than 100 Arabian
leopards left in the wild, and that these leopards are thus many times
more rare than

their 并没有向前指代 reseachers, 而是向后指代 leopards
原因是 determined that 后面的成分在同一层次,their 因此优先指指代其主句主语 leopards.
而且根据逻辑判断 poaching and increased cultivation in their native habitats 排除了their 指代 researchers 的可能。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-19 15:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部