ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1629|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 一题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-28 00:51:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 一题

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

 

  1. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

  2. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

  3. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

  4. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

  5. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

   Answer: 我选A 答案是 C

为什么会选C啊?不是说which 引导的定语从句不能修饰整个句子吗?

沙发
发表于 2008-5-28 01:13:00 | 只看该作者

C的确有问题啊 

but not for monkfish没法还原啊

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 06:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部