- UID
- 1134835
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-7-19
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Forward
* first of all, the point is moot, as (e) is the only answer choice whose parallelism is anywhere close to correct. the first part of the parallel structure refers to vehicles; (e) is the only choice in which the second part likewise refers to vehicles.
* fewer of those pollutants and less of those pollutants have different meanings.
the former means that, if you made lists of the pollutants from each of the two sources, then one of the lists would be missing pollutants that were on the other list.
the latter means that both lists would contain the same pollutants, but that the quantities would be lower on one side.
* finally, if a substance or quantity is measured with numbers and units - such as 385 ppm - you generally use "uncountable" constructions. for example, all of the following are correct (and the corresponding constructions with "fewer" are incorrect):
this cd cost less than $15.
i weigh less than 215 pounds / my body weight is less than 215 pounds.
the concentration of co2 in the atmosphere is less than 400ppm.
if you care about the underlying linguistic reason, it's because we aren't literally counting these units; they're merely a convenient representation of the underlying uncountable quantity, such as money, weight, or co2 concentration. if you need even more of a rationale, note that i could weigh 214.24235 pounds, and that the co2 concentration could be 375.239857 ppm; if these were countable things, both of those statements would be absurd. |
|