ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2004|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-1-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-27 21:10:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-1-4

The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.

Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively undermine the author’s argument?
(A) Although the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is very small, the total number of lightning fatalities is many times greater.
(B) Electric blenders are among the safest household appliances; were the author to compare fatalities from electrical appliances in general, she would get a much higher figure.
(C) Most people would rather take their chances with blenders and golf games than with grizzly bears.
(D) Bears in general—including black, brown, and cinnamon bears, as well as grizzly bears—kill many more people than do electric blenders.
(E) Statistics show that the number of times people use electric blenders each year exceeds the number of times people play golf each year, which in turn far exceeds the number of contacts people have with grizzly bears each year.

答案是E。 请问答案C不对的地方?
我做LSAT时经常发现有时有两个答案模棱两可,不知怎么选择。上述只是其中一个例子。
有没有其他人有相同的郁闷啊? 贴出来讨论一下。或是高人指点迷津? 谢谢。
沙发
发表于 2003-12-27 21:51:00 | 只看该作者
C不行,我认为关键是对句意的理解。决大部分人宁愿将机会给搅拌机和高尔夫比赛而不是灰熊。(翻译不好容易变味)
我想选C 的问题关键是对句意理解的偏差。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-27 22:03:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上。主要是错在 "rather...than...". 如果是说碰到搅和高的机会比熊大,就还说得过去。
地板
发表于 2004-1-9 04:36:00 | 只看该作者
偶认为c是有意思说:绝大多数人宁愿冒险用搅拌器或去高而夫而不远冒险去接触灰熊. 是主观想法.
不象e是客观统计.
5#
发表于 2004-1-9 08:51:00 | 只看该作者
肯定是e对,这就是一个比例的问题,七宗罪里的数字的代表性问题就是可被用于找出要削弱的地方

c只是说出了一个主观上的愿望,没有任何实际上的意义
我虽然很想天天捡到10000D,可这是不可能的啊,想是没有用的了
6#
发表于 2004-1-9 13:11:00 | 只看该作者
很好玩!我终于看到了什么叫主观和实际了!
7#
发表于 2005-1-25 18:24:00 | 只看该作者

关键在判断危险性的标准上。

题干的推理是:每年有多少人因为某种原因死亡,人数越多,危险性越大;人数相等,危险性相当。

但是,简单地用数量来判断是不对的。例如,每年成千上万的人天天使用电器,受电击死亡10人;每年10个人遇到熊,10个都死掉了。虽然然总数相当,但是危险性能说是一样的吗?

危险性的判断标准应当是一个比例标准,要而言之,是一个概率问题。

因此,E的意思是说,统计表明,人们用电器的机会比遇到熊的机会要多得多。反过来说,在单位次数一定的时候,受到伤害的次数是不同的。

8#
发表于 2005-1-25 20:57:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-1-4

蓝老师,我来支持你了。

ivy here.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 19:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部