ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1970|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

小女第一篇作文 没多少时间准备啦!急 牛人帮忙!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-16 23:32:00 | 只看该作者

小女第一篇作文 没多少时间准备啦!急 牛人帮忙!

 人把动物拿来搞药物试验,为人类作贡献   此行为正当否?

 Animals, we see mostly on TV, in the zoo, at home, recently take new    roles in the medicine test experiments, devoting their lives to drug test. In result of this, they are named "medical animals". It leaves us a question: Is the test justified? Some people speak highly of this new access in medical field, for it is surely good for humans' health issue and may offer assist to the inventory of new drugs, while the others are object to it, accusing it because it lacks justice and morality, and argue it might bring some incredible and unpredictable troubles to nature. As far as I'm concerned, I’m inclined to the latter view. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.

    The predominant contributor why I refute the medical animal being used in medicine test is that this experiment neglects animals' right to live. Scientists, in order to reduce the harm medicines bring to humans, are irresponsible to take advantage of animals’ live. Naturally born, naturally die, water and food fed, humans and animals are no doubt the same in quite a few sides. We share the same environment, the same resource, the same sunlight and the same life. However, humans regard themselves as dominators of the others and deprive the privilege of animals to live. It is reported that during a study of a certain tested medicine, about thirty mice and rabbits were injected the medicine and most of them died. Obviously, animals suffer a lot in laboratory: they are forced to take pills, absorb toxic gas and get injection. It is human who despoils chances of those charming creatures to watch the sun rising, to smell the flower blooming, to enjoy the breeze blowing.

     In the second place, another reason why I reject the test is that it may destruct the varieties animals’ gene bank. We will never know what would happen to these animals after they receive the medicine, some may catch diseases, some may die, but the most astonishing case is the change of gene. However this vary, brought by human activities instead of nature evolution, will be kept by heredity. Some odd genes are brought in, and then great deals of horrible changes are worked out on outside appearance. A news report shows that till now, the chicken with three legs, the mouse possesses a ear on the back are founded, even terrifying infant born with no eyelids. Not to be exaggerating, the medicine test not only pollutes animals' gene bank, but also enormously influences that of humans. All the creatures, including ourselves, are involved in the companied effect of these experiments.

      In conclusion to my opinion, animals and humans are in coequality statue. As a result, none of us have access to deprive the others' lives except nature. The drug test severely offences the animals' privilege to live, and also has the tendency to contaminate the animals’ gene bank, which may damage the ecosystem balance. We’d better to find another kind of approach to carry on the test  without the usage of animals.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-2-17 15:29:39编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

NTU MBA
MSGO
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-8 13:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部