ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2219|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

斑竹帮我批个分吧~谢谢了!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-3 14:33:00 | 只看该作者

斑竹帮我批个分吧~谢谢了!

这篇文章写的我实在是没想法了,觉得自己越写越偏题了。。。

题目:Subjects such as art, music, and drama should be a part of every child’s basic education. agree or disagree

 

 

Do you enjoy Beethoven’s symphony? Do you appreciate Leonardo Da Vinci’s paintings? To most people, the answers are definitely “yes”. Your ability of appreciation mostly came from the subjects such as art, music, and drama when you were a kid. So personally, I agree that these kinds of subjects should be a part of children’s basic education.

 

 

On the one hand, kids are always curious about everything around them, and they tend to imitate what they like. So it’s very important to help them learn the concept of righteousness at that stage. It’s apparent that kids are quite interesting in stories and performing arts, so why not teach them the rules and norms of the society as well as the traditions of the region by the form of art? The greatest sage in China Confucius said, and I paraphrase, art is the mother of nature, and the mother of human beings. So it’s obvious that kids should learn the primary lessons od the world from their “mothers”.

 

 

On the other hand, children usually have a talent of art. Scientific researches made by Pekin
     University showed that ninety percents of the children involved in the experiment can understand music, drama, and other kinds of art basically correctly after a brief introduction of the masterpieces showed to them, which means there will be no difficulties for teachers to teach art to little children. On the contrary, as I mentioned, if children do have a gift of art, it will probably be the case that children have a much more special understanding of art than those adults do. Therefore, why don’t we give them the chance to create a colorful understanding of those classic works through the learning of these artistic subjects?

 

 

Generally speaking, I find no reason why those artistic subjects should not be included in children’s curriculums.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-2-11 19:14:28编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-5 13:13:00 | 只看该作者
为什么都没人理阿?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-12 19:22:00 | 只看该作者
自己顶~
地板
发表于 2008-2-15 06:38:00 | 只看该作者

I've seen a lot of compositions here using different templates helping them have good structures. However, this one is the best, out of those template-free compositions. I will give 24 if I am a rater.

 

 

Do you enjoy Beethoven’s symphony? Do you appreciate Leonardo Da Vinci’s paintings? To most people, the answers are definitely “yes”. Your(their) ability of appreciation mostly came from the subjects such as art, music, and drama when you(they) were a kid. So personally, I agree that these kinds of subjects should be a part of children’s basic education.

On the(x) one hand, kids are always curious about everything around them, and they tend to imitate what they like(acquire). So it’s very important to help them learn the concept of righteousness at that stage. It’s apparent that kids are quite interesting(ted) in stories and performing arts(stories and art performances), so why not teach them the rules and norms of the society as well as the traditions of the region(local traditions) by the form of art? as The greatest sage in China(Chinese sage) Confucius said, and I paraphrase(x, do not introduce egoism), art is the mother of nature, and the mother of human beings. So it’s obvious that kids should learn the primary lessons od the world from their “mother’

On the other hand, children usually have a talent of art. Scientific researches made(conducted) by Peking University showed that ninety percents(percent) of the children
      involved in the experiment(you are making the study humble, correct it to: the investigated children) can understand music, drama, and other kinds of art(s)
      basically(x) correctly after a brief introduction of the masterpieces showed to them(x), which means(indicates) there will be no difficulties for teachers to teach art to little children. On the contrary, as I mentioned(x, do not introduce egoism), if children do have a gift of art, it will probably be the case that children have a much more special understanding of art than those adults do. Therefore, why don’t we give them the chance to create a colorful understanding of those classic works through the learning of these artistic subjects?

Generally speaking, I find no reason why those artistic subjects should not be included in children’s curriculums. (the conclusion is too simple though)


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-2-15 6:42:23编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-15 19:34:00 | 只看该作者
THANKS A LOT!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

NTU MBA
MSGO
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 23:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部