ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1027|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] prep-1-58

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-12-30 22:30:00 | 只看该作者

[求助] prep-1-58

58.
   
(34705-!-item-!-188;#058&007581)

Roland:  The alarming fact is that 90 percent of the people in this country now report that they know someone who is unemployed.

Sharon:  But a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent, with 1 out of 20 workers unemployed.  So at any given time if a person knows approximately 50 workers, 1 or more will very likely be unemployed.

Sharon's argument relies on the assumption that

(A) normal levels of unemployment are rarely exceeded

(B) unemployment is not normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of the population

(C) the number of people who each know someone who is unemployed is always higher than 90% of the population

(D) Roland is not consciously distorting the statistics he presents

(E) knowledge that a personal acquaintance is unemployed generates more fear of losing one's job than does knowledge of unemployment statistics

在A和B之间徘徊了很久(答案是B),请哪位帮忙解释一下A和B。谢谢!

在A和B之间徘徊了很久(答案是B),请哪位帮忙解释一下A和B。谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-30 22:30:17编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-12-30 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

这里是SC区! 

取非削弱,必须是削弱结论。A削弱的是前提(a normal, moderate level of unemployment is 5 percent)

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-1-1 10:00:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思,麻烦版主帮忙转移到"逻辑区" 去一下,谢谢!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-1-1 10:11:00 | 只看该作者

A和B都不太明白。

请问:如果对B取反,即人口如果normally concentrated in geographically isolated segments of the population,又会怎么样呢?

谢谢解答!


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-1 10:22:39编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-4 16:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部