ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4926|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-8-Q41:关于可数与不可数名词的问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-12-26 01:53:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-8-Q41:关于可数与不可数名词的问题

When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.

A.      there are less than one-quarter that many

B.     there are fewer than one-quarter as many 

C.     there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount

D.     the number is less than one-quarter the amount

E.     it is less than one-quarter of that amount

C。

但我觉得如果是c,由于amount是修饰不可数的,则one-quarter也是不可数了,怎么能用fewer呢?

但我觉得如果是c,由于amount是修饰不可数的,则one-quarter也是不可数了,怎么能用fewer呢?

我想选B,但as many在这里到底是个什么用法呢?似乎也没见过

as在这里是个介词?many是代词指代d-ins?

各位怎么看

各位怎么看


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-6 18:53:17编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-12-31 21:58:00 | 只看该作者

顶~~大家看看啊

板凳
发表于 2008-5-5 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

最好的答案是C,如果C中的amount改成number,这样更好。

不过amount也有number的意思。也可以理解,在这个意思下,也可以修饰可数名词。

在数量的意思下,修饰不可数名词,如a great amount of sth

amount
n.abbr:amt.
1)The total of two or more quantities; the aggregate.
 合计,总额两个或两个以上数量的总和;合计
2)A number; a sum. 数字;总数
3)Quantity: 数量:
a great amount of intelligence.
非常聪明

地板
发表于 2009-5-24 16:49:00 | 只看该作者
vote for B
5#
发表于 2009-5-24 23:16:00 | 只看该作者
6#
发表于 2009-8-8 17:30:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得答案是 A

GWD-8-Q41:
                

When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.

单独修饰分数,用less不用fewer,修饰 分数+of+n,由所修饰的n决定用less还是fewer

修饰可数名词用many,修饰不可数名词用amount。drive-ins是可数名词,所以用amount的全错,排除CDE,剩下AB。

B选项 there are fewer than one-quarter as many

as many结构错误,应该as many as,这是次要,关键在于as放在one-quarter和many之间,不能形成什么的几分之几这种结构。那么fewer应该就近修饰one-quarter,而修饰分数应该用less。

其实答案A之所以对,只要理解less than one-quarter这个结构是一个意群即可,或者理解成1/5,1/6之类的,也是一个分数,less than修饰one-quarter。1/5 that many完全可以理解成分数+of+n这个结构,由可数n决定用fewer不用less

因此这题我认为选A

7#
发表于 2011-4-2 17:55:49 | 只看该作者
我觉得答案是 A

GWD-8-Q41:




When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.



单独修饰分数,用less不用fewer,修饰 分数+of+n,由所修饰的n决定用less还是fewer



修饰可数名词用many,修饰不可数名词用amount。drive-ins是可数名词,所以用amount的全错,排除CDE,剩下AB。



B选项 there are fewer than one-quarter as many



as many结构错误,应该as many as,这是次要,关键在于as放在one-quarter和many之间,不能形成什么的几分之几这种结构。那么fewer应该就近修饰one-quarter,而修饰分数应该用less。






其实答案A之所以对,只要理解less than one-quarter这个结构是一个意群即可,或者理解成1/5,1/6之类的,也是一个分数,less than修饰one-quarter。1/5 that many完全可以理解成分数+of+n这个结构,由可数n决定用fewer不用less






因此这题我认为选A



-- by 会员 kevinli120 (2009/8/8 17:30:00)


你分析了很多,我没仔细看,由可数n决定用fewer不用less,这句不是你最后的结论么?那你还选A,A可是LESS哦。
8#
发表于 2013-3-24 10:17:29 | 只看该作者
答案是B
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部