A verb is supposed to agree with the subject. a. Singular + Plural agreement. Do the two agree in plurality? Can be made very complex when prepositional phrases separate verb from noun/subject by 5 or more words. Easy to overlook cross referenced subject-verb relationship. b. To tell if a verb paradigm is plural or singular. § Mentally put “They” in front of the verb ß plural § Mentally put “He” in front of the verb ß singular c. Verb plurality: (This comes up A LOT on the GMAT) Adding an “s” to the end of an adjective makes it singular. For example, dislike ß plural dislikes ß singular
quote: I chose A, but the correct answer is B. The majority of the talk was devoted to an account of the experimental methods used by investigators in the field. a. ... b. The greater part of the talk was c. The bulk of the talk has been d. A large amount of the talk has been e. A predominance of the talk was Good one!! "majority" should be used with count nouns only.
The majority of the water is dirty. Is "unidiomatic," because "water" is a non-count noun. Just in case, count nouns can be counted (bottle, idea, person, brush, etc.); Noncount nouns cannot be counted (water, furniture, information, soap, luggage, etc.).
There is, however, a lot of overlap between the two--beer, coke, coffee, material, love, etc. can all be either count or non-count, depending on our meaning, context, or level of formality.
One of the most common questions is something like this: Do I say: "Most of the people is/are...?" "Most of the water is/are...?"
Here's the rule: quantifier + of + NOUN + verb
The NOUN determines whether the verb is singular or plural.
For example: Most of the people is/are... because the quantifier "most" refers to "people," (a plural noun) so "most" is plural in this sentence.
Most of the water is/are... because the quantifier "most" refers to "water," (a non-count noun) so "most" is plural in this sentence.
So, from these examples, you should notice that we are looking mainly at whether the object of the preposition is count or non-count because the quantifier will take on this property from the object of the preposition.
In other words, in these sentences: Most of the people are... "Most" becomes a count noun because "people" is a count noun. Most of the water is... "Most" becomes a non-count noun because "water" is a non-count noun. So, this rule tells us only whether the quantifier is count or non-count.
To figure out whether the quantifier is singular or plural, we need to check one more thing... Sometimes, a quantifier refers only to one thing, not many things. For example, each, every, and one always refer to one thing, but 10%, half, all, and most would refer to more than one thing if the object of the preposition is count (with one possible exception that I will show you in a second).
Of course, if the quantifier is always singular, then the verb must always be singular, too. (Let's not forget our common sense in grammar, okay??) For example, we say: • One of the people is... • Each of the students is...
Of course, when I first wrote out these rules, I imagined a situation like this: • 1% of the 100 people is/are... because, of course, 1% of 100 is one, and that's singular, right? And there's invariably some student in my class who will try to find an exception (that's what I do in class, too!! My teachers hated it!! ) Anyway, I think most people would say that this is simply a bad sentence and should be rewritten. This sentence I've shown you is more of a grammar puzzle than a real sentence. But I know that somebody out there will want to know the "answer." Well, you can't go wrong if you write it in the singular, can you? § The teacher together with the student IS (or ARE) going to...? § The teacher and the student ARE (or IS)going to? Generally speaking, we need a conjunction to create a plural subject from more than one singular noun. "together with" is NOT a conjunction, and therefore cannot create a plural subject. "and" on the other hand, IS a conjunction and CAN create a plural subject. I'm concluding: "a number of ..." always takes plural verbs. "the number of ..." always takes singular verbs.
Eg: the number of people has increased A number of people have gone
The important thing here is that the number in the first example (the number of women employed outside the home) is an actual number--35,000, for example. Even if you add more women to the original number, there will still be one number, right? The second usage of "numbers" is also correct, and means that there are many people in that group. For example, it is correct to say: People are leaving California in greater numbers. People are spending more money on the Internet in greater numbers.
Second, "curfew" is a singular count noun and therefore requires a determiner (the). I agree with you that skill can be both a count noun as well as a non-count noun. It all depends upon the context.
Have a look at the example below: 1. Harry knows quite a few driving skills. Conversely, if were to ask Harry about his driving skills, I would ask.
2. How much skill do you have in driving a car, Harry? So you see, the word "skill" remains the same but depending on the context, skill can be a non-count or a count noun?
With fractions, percentages and indefinite quantifiers, the verb agrees with the preceding noun or clause. With singular or non-count nouns or clauses, use a singular verb: - One third of this article is taken up with statistical analysis.
- All of the book seems relevant to this study.
- Half of what he writes is undocumented.
- About fifty percent of the job is routine.
- All the information is current.
With plural nouns, use plural verbs:
- One third of the students have graduate degrees.
- Fifty percent of the computers have CD-ROM drives.
- Many researchers depend on grants from industry.
With collective nouns, use either singular or plural, depending on whether you want to emphasize the single group or its individual members:
- Half of my family lives/live in Canada.
- All of the class is/are here.
- Ten percent of the population is/are bilingual.
This is another reason, and this one's a bit harder to explain. In a nutshell, though, we can't use a that noun clause with the word directive, just as we cannot with order, as hellogmat has pointed out.
This error is not a frequently encountered error, but it is worth knowing and practicing such errors. In such sentences, generally two things or items are compared. a. When the sentence compares two items. Ask yourself, can they be really compared? b. When the sentence compares two actions as well.
Usually, the problem is with hidden comparison where two things or actions are compared, but another two items or actions are intertwined and you lose the comparison relationship.
Example: “Synthetic oils burn less efficiently than natural oils.”
The sentence is wrong because we are trying to compare how well each oil burns and not the oils themselves. But do you see how the actual thing being compared is easily missed?
i. The words measuring quantity may be used incorrectly. For example, when comparing two items, it would be inappropriate to use “among” to compare them. Here’s a chart:
2 items if more than 2 Between among More most Better best Less least
ii. Items that can’t be counted should not use quantity words. For example, you can’t say “fewer soup”. Here’s a chart:
Non-countable words Countable words Less fewer Amount, quantity number Much many
iii. When two distinct words or phrases are joined by the correlatives either, or, neither, nor, not only, but also, the number (singular or plural) of the word or phrase nearest to the verb determines the number of the verb. § Example: Either his parents or he is bringing it (notice “is” is singular) This can be a confusing sentence because parents is plural, but we pay attention to he which is the noun “he” tells us that we need to keep “is” singular. § Example: Either he or his parents are bringing it. Notice “parents” is plural and is the closest to the verb so we use “are” which is plural.
|