ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3300|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PRINCETON 27

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-11 18:43:00 | 只看该作者

PRINCETON 27

27.Many of America’s political allies have demanded that the United States repeal the (Helms-Burton law of 1996, tightening the embargo on all Cuban products and, according to opponents of it, violating )several international treaties.
A.Helms-Burton law of 1996, tightening the embargo on all Cuban products and, according to opponents of it, violating
B.Helms-Burton law of 1996, whose tightening of the embargo on all Cuban products violates, according to its opponents,
C.Helms-Burton law of 1996, which tightens the embargo on all Cuban products and which, according to its opponents, violates
答案:C.
为什么不是A? 请教各位大牛!

沙发
发表于 2003-12-12 17:30:00 | 只看该作者
tightening 修饰Many of America’s political allies
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-12 19:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ios在2003-12-12 17:30:00的发言:
tightening 修饰Many of America’s political allies
i请问ios GG,为什么tightening 不是近邻修饰它前面的名词the Helms-Burton law of 1996,而是修饰句子主语Many of America’s political allies呢?
我对现在分词的修饰问题不太清楚,请GG指教!
地板
发表于 2003-12-13 22:20:00 | 只看该作者
sorry!上面的讲法错了。
现在分词在句首才是修饰主语。
现在分词在句尾是主句的伴随动作,而不是修饰临近的名词。

所以这体用定语从句修饰。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-14 15:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ios在2003-12-13 22:20:00的发言:
sorry!上面的讲法错了。
现在分词在句首才是修饰主语。
现在分词在句尾是主句的伴随动作,而不是修饰临近的名词。

所以这体用定语从句修饰。
请见OG 39题,现在分词修饰它前面的名词。
请指教!
6#
发表于 2003-12-14 16:24:00 | 只看该作者
有个想法,记得关于是用分词还是用WHICH从句,好象是分词强调动作的正在进行的过程,而从句就是强调状态。
7#
发表于 2003-12-14 21:12:00 | 只看该作者
此题句尾的现在分词之前有逗号,我所说的是这种情况。
如果没有逗号,而是紧接着名词,那就是修饰名词,如og39 中protecting修饰a method.
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-16 19:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用christinahong在2003-12-14 15:06:00的发言:
请见OG 39题,现在分词修饰它前面的名词。
请指教!
39.For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, (a method to protect) warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
(A) a method to protect
(B) as a method protecting
(C) protecting
(D) as a protection of
(E) to protect
Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did. protecting解释的是主句主语animal-hide shields 的用途,用来修饰主句主语,是否可以这样说?

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-16 19:08:00 | 只看该作者
在这题中tightening the embargo on all Cuban products and, according to opponents of it, violating
两个并列的现在分词修饰在它之前、与它紧邻的句子that the United States repeal the (Helms-Burton law of 1996中的主语the United States,做这个句子的伴随状语。
而根据题意,the Helms-Burton law of 1996造成了后面的情况,应当用which tightens and which violates修饰the Helms-Burton law of 1996,which就近修饰它前面紧邻的名词。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 14:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部