ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lissy_721
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-Q13

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2009-7-7 21:41:00 | 只看该作者
up
12#
发表于 2009-7-31 16:57:00 | 只看该作者
up
13#
发表于 2010-5-10 00:01:28 | 只看该作者
a中的vanishing    有名词的意思
14#
发表于 2010-9-15 12:49:11 | 只看该作者
请问不可以用due to么?我觉得D中结构也是平行的,我当时选的是D
in the northeastern United States,作为插入语不行么?原文意思也没有改变啊
15#
发表于 2012-1-7 14:31:46 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lissy_721在2007-11-25 18:05:00的发言:
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland sandpiper needs for feeding and nesting when it returns in May after wintering in the Argentine Pampas, the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in farming practices.







A. the sandpipers vanishing in the northeastern United States is a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in鸟不是result,句子意思不对



B. the bird itself is vanishing in the northeastern United States as a result of residential and industrial development and of changes in



C. that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northeastern United States is due to residential and industrial development and changes to从句比较错误



D. in the northeastern United States, sandpipers’ vanishing is due to residential and industrial development and to changes in



E. in the northeastern United States, the sandpipers’ vanishing, a result of residential and industrial development and changing

实在不明白这样的比较应该怎么分析,请nn指点!!
ans:B




答案的确是B,这道题的比较对象是草地和鸟,可能你认为这不是同类。但是问题就在这里,实质上比较的是草地的消失和鸟的消失,但是like引导的是草地,消失的含义被隐藏掉了,尽管这样,你还是得把草地和鸟比较起来,不能把草地和鸟的消失比较。
-- by 会员 prayer (2007/11/25 18:51:00)




A主谓不一致
16#
发表于 2012-10-16 15:05:39 | 只看该作者
请问不可以用due to么?我觉得D中结构也是平行的,我当时选的是D
in the northeastern United States,作为插入语不行么?原文意思也没有改变啊
-- by 会员 玉轩剑 (2010/9/15 12:49:11)


具体名词和动作性名词不能平行么,D的平行不对
还有 我觉得in the northeastern United States位子也不好,虽然前面有个in the Argentine Pampas不影响它向后修饰的理解(这个题这里应该没错的),但如果没有in the Argentine Pampas的话,in the northeastern United States可以向前修饰 也可以向后修饰,记得做到过这种题,改法就是B 那样,改变状语的位置。
17#
发表于 2019-9-29 17:26:31 | 只看该作者
lissy_721 发表于 2007-11-25 18:05
Like the grassy fields and old pastures that the upland ...

句子的本意是将grassy fields and old pastures和the sandpiper进行比较,like后面比较的主体是the grassy fields and old pastures,that后的从句是对这两个物体的修饰,可以忽略。
A选项,comma后的主语是the sandpipers vanishing,逻辑错误,the sandpipers vanishing(事件)不能和 grassy fields and old pasture(事物)进行比较
B选项,the bird itself指the sandpiper,对
C选项, comma 后面的主语是that the birds themselves are vanishing in the northestern United States,不能和grassy fiels and pastures进行比较
DE选项,不仅在like和主句之间加了插入语让句子显得awkward,并且the sandpipers' vanishing和grassy fields and pastures之间也不构成比较关系,所以也错了
这样的like...comma...类型的句子其实在理解句意之后第一步就是按照比较的逻辑进行排除,会比较快,like后面的比较对象和comma后面的比较对象必须逻辑上说得同,否则就错了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-28 19:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部