ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 939|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家帮忙看下这题。。谢谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-11-16 08:44:00 | 只看该作者

大家帮忙看下这题。。谢谢

Smithtown
                        University
’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing [C1] effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?(A.C爭議題)

  1. Smithtown
                                    University
    ’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people. [C2] 

  2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown
                                    University
    from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.[C3] 

  3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown
                                    University
    from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.[C4] 

  4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown
                                    University
    this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.[C5] 

  5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown
                                    University
    ’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
沙发
发表于 2007-11-16 10:06:00 | 只看该作者

首先呢,这里是语法区……

我选C,The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing (游说) effort,C直接说的就是来捐款的人都没有人和他们联系,那么也就是说那些fund-raiser一天到晚都在忙以前没有捐款的人,或者每天闲着什么事也不干,每天闲着当然insufficient canvassing effort,在忙没有捐款的人,才只占据了20%,那必然也是effort不够。

A是拿S学校的人和other学校做比较,无关啊。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-16 10:14:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,搞错了地方了。。。

btw...thanx for helping...

地板
发表于 2007-11-16 13:13:00 | 只看该作者
不要什么题都有争议吧。这题如果还会在a和c之间争议,那先别做题了。先去把基本逻辑再复习下吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-17 18:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部