Oct.18 CD1-Track17 Journalism: Newspapers and Journalists In the US constitution it is stated that the congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech of the press. This puts forth the foundation of journalism in the United States. The government and the press are 2 separate entities. The people who wrote the 1st amendment understood that journalists are human beings and that they can make mistakes. The press even though it is not perfect was to take on the job of government critic with its responsibility to the citizens of America not to the government. At the core of the way in which the press operates is independence. Newspaper owners may support a particular party, but it is becoming more common for a newspaper and its journalists to be totally independent in every way. Unfortunately sometimes this is a goal to work towards and not a description which shows the truth. Staff and the newspaper they represent should show freedom of thought and action. A newspaper must not print stories for the sole purpose of promoting people who support it. Journalists cannot receive money, holidays, or gifts from special groups for favorable news coverage. If a newspaper were corrupt it could not criticize the government for being corrupt. Sometimes things like a free meal or sports tickets are acceptable though, but this is not practice written in stone. There are not really any rewards for the type or amount of freedom that the press enjoys, maybe devotion of the readers in trust. With freedom of the press a newspaper can still report a story in the way it wished. However, it must still adhere to the laws of libel. The basic idea is that there must be truth to what the newspaper prints and the newspaper must be able to show that they are being truthful. It is common for a newspaper to separate its ideas and beliefs from the objective presentation of truth. The news is presented with sources identified when possible. It is only on the editorialpage that the newspaper gives its and other staff members or syndicated writers personal opinions. For a newspaper to not sound one sided or closed minded to others it often has a section devoted to letters that people write to the newspaper about how the news is being reported and other versions of the truth if one or several happen to exist. The newspapers reserve the right to edit as necessary so that there is fair presentation. A newspaper must also be sure to remain responsible if it does make a mistake. Correction should be printed in the same part of the newspaper all the time so they are easier to be found. A newspaper must also know when to draw the line when they have crossed the boundary of invading somebody’s private life. It is at this point that the newspaper must look at what it is saying and doing and re-evaluate the situation. Journalists must follow the same laws as does everybody else but must be extremely enthusiastic in uncovering the truth. In doing this they become a type of supervisor or watchdog. Newspapers must be careful of becoming caught up in something called prizeman-ship(得奖门事件), presenting stories in a certain way with the sole purpose of the newspaper or the journalist winning a prize. This has happened before. A journalist made up the story and ended up winning the Pulitzer Prize. In the end the journalists revealed the truth and quit her job. The newspaper gave the award back with great humiliation. It is okay for newspapers and journalists to receive prizes, but they should be from people or groups who have no connection to the recipient and they should be without the recipient knowing it. There is the temptation to exaggerate the facts but this must always be avoided. Journalists must always remember this last rule in being a journalist. Above all one must be aware of the possibility that he or she might be wrong, that a mistake has been made. There can be many viewpoints which distort the truth. Journalists must remember when an error is made there is always somebody who is going to be hurt. It is for this that the truth must always be found and never interpreted. 总的来说,根据标题"新闻业"展开还是比较容易听出来米国新闻出版以及记者的性质及责任. 就是该文章的speaker舌头太大,而且长句使用频繁,容易造成一些理解上的困难. 划线部分如果大家在做了笔记后能进行相应的展开,基本上就能将一些detail部分回忆出来. 1. What is the lecture mainly about? A Freedom of speech and newspapers. B Journalism and freedom of the press. C How the media distorts the truth. D The history of journalism. 2. According to the lecture, why is “prizemanship” mainly problematic? A Journalists may distort the truth. B Journalists can be invading some privacy. C Newspapers feel humiliated when their journalists do not win the prize. D The truth must always be found and never interpreted. CD1-Track 19 Law: Law in America While America was being colonized, that is from 1607 to 1776, those who were interested in pursuing a career in law had to go to England and attend Inns of Court for their legal training. These inns where far from schools, but were merely part of the English law society and help students familiarize themselves with English law. It was common for people who wanted to be lawyers to undertake a clerkship or an apprenticeship with somebody already established in the legal world. Once America became United States of America independent from the British the rules and regulations for becoming a lawyer were very lax and the number of people who became lawyers sky rocketed(数量激增,貌似雨后春笋). The most common way for someone to enter the legal world was by apprenticeship(学历). But as time went on law schools were established at various law offices which focused on training. The 1st school(很敏感的词哦) was Litchfield School in Connecticut in 1784 and focused on commercial law. Colleges slowly added law as part of their course offerings, but it was not until 1817 that Harvard University established the 1st independent law school. From 1850 to 1900 the number of law schools grew from 15 to 102. These schools did not require that students hold an undergraduate degree when entering and it was norm for the program to be completed in 1year. However in the late 1800s there were more and more 2year programs. The teaching of law went through a radical change(根本的改变) in Harvard University. Students who did not already have an undergraduate degree had to take an entrance exam(改变). By 1871 the course was 2years long and by 1876 it was 3years(改变) long. At the end of the 1st year there was a comprehensive exam(改变) that had to be passed if the student wanted to continue on to the next year of study. The most dramatic change which is still in practice today is the way teaching is done. Instead of listening to lectures students studied cases. From the cases that were studied students were expected to understand the principles of law. What they meant and how they developed. Teaching followed the ancient Greek style Socratic questioning so students would discover the foundations of the laws represented by each case. As the need for more lawyers grew by the late 1800s the number of law schools that opened also grew. Not a lot of money was needed to open a law school and as a result several were opened. There were even night schools for studying law many of which had lawyers and judges as teachers. A problem with many of the schools that opened was that the standards were low and the material studied had an emphasis on what was customary in a specific region. The most important contribution of this is that studying law became available to everybody and not just the rich of the upper class. By the turn of the century there was a dramatic increase in the number of people studying law. By 1960s schools had to be selective in who they permitted entrance. To better represent the nation law schools began to look for female and minority students. The curriculum was changing too. Civil rights along with poverty issues along with international law was being taught. 在经历过上篇那位老哥嚼馍式的发言后,这篇发言的仁兄的口齿则显得清晰得多,而且有许多让人为之一振的地方"1st\had to\the most important\the dramatic...\这些敏感词的出现则相对让我们的听记有了方向,知道他想强调什么了,而且题目也极有围绕这些敏感词来出.大家体会一下吧. 1. What is the main topic of the lecture? A The history of the law system in America. B The difference between British law schools and American law schools. C The development of education laws in America. D The history of law schools in America.(年份词较多) 2. According to the lecture, which of the following is NOT mentioned as main changes in the late 19th century at Harvard University? A Some applicants were required to test an entrance examination to get admitted to the school. B Case studies became the main method of teaching. C Studying law became a 3 year endeavor. D Students should pass the comprehensive examination to graduate from the school.这个得细听,貌似是提到那个综合考试,但是是为了继续下一年(3rd years)的深造而过的,不是为了毕业. 忘了说,因为LP第一篇听的很郁闷 ,所以跳了一篇18从17直接到了19.
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-19 11:11:18编辑过] |