ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The commission's office of compliance, inspections, and investigations plans to intensify its scrutiny of stock analysts to investigate not only whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are paid for their work by a firm's investment banking division.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2211|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

目前还没有人正确解释过T-9-Q15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-20 12:05:00 | 只看该作者

目前还没有人正确解释过T-9-Q15

The commission’s office of compliance, inspection, and investigations plans to intensify its security of stock analysts to investigate not only whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts results when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are paid for their work by a firm’s investment banking division.

  1. to investigate not only whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts results[1]  when analysts own the stocks they write about or when they are paid

  2. to investigate not only whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also if conflicts results when analysts own the stocks they write about or they are

  3. to not only investigate whether or not research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also if conflicts results when analysts own the stocks they write about or are

  4. not only to investigate whether or not research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or are

  5. not only to investigate whether research is an independent function at brokerage firms, but also whether conflicts result when analysts own the stocks they write about or when

     [1]的确从平行结构上看,只有Anot only whether…but also whether…最好,但是conflicts results是什么用法呢?

    谓语不是应该用复数吗?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-4 21:20:00 | 只看该作者
有没有人能给我一个解释啊?先谢谢各位了.
板凳
发表于 2007-10-4 22:35:00 | 只看该作者
the second whether-clause omitted "research" in the first whether-clause. "research" is the subject in both whether-clauses.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-4 23:38:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks. I see.
5#
发表于 2008-2-28 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

不理解,research conficts results?  感觉很不通顺?

而且 有两个重句的主语通用的的用法吗?

6#
发表于 2008-2-28 13:19:00 | 只看该作者
请nn们指教
7#
发表于 2008-5-28 11:17:00 | 只看该作者
此题无解!
8#
发表于 2008-5-28 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
第一直觉就是题打错了
9#
发表于 2009-8-4 14:38:00 | 只看该作者
upup
10#
发表于 2009-8-4 14:38:00 | 只看该作者
upup
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-10 08:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部