谁做了200406真题,我有问题想讨论

ivy3997

做过的朋友觉得难度如何,奇怪的是我连game都有一个疑问死都没想明白

还有阅读和逻辑的,谁做过的有印象,可以讨论一下吗?

这个真题解析我没找到

jdxf

我做了

你把不明白的贴上来

大家讨论吧

ivy3997

谢谢你的回复....

很感激

RC的12题我很不理解,C选项几乎和最后一段的example一样,为什么选择B呢?而且example里也没提及expected的situational factors啊?

还有第20题,根据上下文,是如何推测出的呢?A不是更衔接一些么?

22题选择D就更加困惑了,这不是全局题么?D说的是最后一段才提到的部分,A怎么就不合适呢?

第二篇LR里的22题paralle,当时在D和E上犹豫了好久,似乎E也看着合适,他有什么错误呢?

剩下居然还有个game不懂,简直汗死了,第18,怎么C全选不可以呢? 看不出X和Z的选择有什么区别

如果您都能帮我回顾和解答一下,实在是much obliged.

icewarm

RC 12:

But situational factors do not account for all

code-switching; it occurs even when the domain

would lead one not to expect it. In these cases, one

language tends to be the primary one, while the other

is used only sparingly to achieve certain rhetorical

effects. Often the switches are so subtle that the

speakers themselves are not aware of them. This was

the case with a study of a family of Puerto Rican

Americans in another community. Family members

believed they used only English at home, but their

taped conversations occasionally contained some

Spanish, with no change in situational factors.

When asked what the presence of Spanish signified, they

commented that it was used to express certain

attitudes such as intimacy or humor more

emphatically.

That's B

RC 20:

However, while a literary work is indeed

encoded in various signs and symbols that must be

translated for the work to be understood and

appreciated, it is not a map.

The author here is only conceding a point  that "a reader must be guided by the text to some degree" and then stress his OWN point that these "signs and symbols" should not dictate readers like they do in a map.

RC 22:

Main point of this passage is given in the last sentence in the first passage: " There is therefore a need to consider the different intellectual property policies that govern the commercial exploitation of faculty inventions in order to determine which would provide the appropriate level of flexibility." The whole passage was analyzing current polices and pointing out their weakness. In the final paragraph, the author give his anwer that mirrors the main point.

D summrizes the whole things well.

A missed the author's main point. The author clearly says "flexibility" is needed, which is 180 to what A says : a clear-cut policy.

LR 22

22. Taking advanced mathematics courses should increase

a student’s grade point average, for, as numerous

studies have shown, students who have taken one or

more advanced mathematics courses are far more likely

to have high grade point averages than students who

have not taken such courses.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above

is most similar to that in which one of the following?

(A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as

many studies have shown, black cats are more

likely than others to have black kittens, and

orange cats are more likely to have orange

kittens.

(B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing

scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon

and water, gin and water, and vodka and water

all cause intoxication.

(C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and

carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some

people. Studies have shown that many

overweight people eat such diets.

(D) Buying running shoes should increase the

frequency with which a person exercises, since

those who buy two or more pairs of running

shoes each year tend to exercise more often

than those who buy at most one pair.

(E) Reading to children at an early age should

inspire them to read on their own later, since

studies have shown that children who have not

been read to are less likely to develop an

interest in reading than children who have been

read to.

When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.

is most similar to that in which one of the following?

(A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as

many studies have shown, black cats are more

likely than others to have black kittens, and

orange cats are more likely to have orange

kittens.

(B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing

scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon

and water, gin and water, and vodka and water

all cause intoxication.

(C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and

carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some

people. Studies have shown that many

overweight people eat such diets.

(D) Buying running shoes should increase the

frequency with which a person exercises, since

those who buy two or more pairs of running

shoes each year tend to exercise more often

than those who buy at most one pair.

(E) Reading to children at an early age should

inspire them to read on their own later, since

studies have shown that children who have not

been read to are less likely to develop an

interest in reading than children who have been

read to.

When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.

studies have shown, students who have taken one or

more advanced mathematics courses are far more likely

to have high grade point averages than students who

have not taken such courses.

The flawed pattern of reasoning in the argument above

is most similar to that in which one of the following?

(A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as

many studies have shown, black cats are more

likely than others to have black kittens, and

orange cats are more likely to have orange

kittens.

(B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing

scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon

and water, gin and water, and vodka and water

all cause intoxication.

(C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and

carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some

people. Studies have shown that many

overweight people eat such diets.

(D) Buying running shoes should increase the

frequency with which a person exercises, since

those who buy two or more pairs of running

shoes each year tend to exercise more often

than those who buy at most one pair.

(E) Reading to children at an early age should

inspire them to read on their own later, since

studies have shown that children who have not

been read to are less likely to develop an

interest in reading than children who have been

read to.

When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.

is most similar to that in which one of the following?

(A) Fur color is in large measure hereditary, for, as

many studies have shown, black cats are more

likely than others to have black kittens, and

orange cats are more likely to have orange

kittens.

(B) Water can cause intoxication. After all, imbibing

scotch and water, whiskey and water, bourbon

and water, gin and water, and vodka and water

all cause intoxication.

(C) Eating a diet consisting primarily of fats and

carbohydrates may cause weight gain in some

people. Studies have shown that many

overweight people eat such diets.

(D) Buying running shoes should increase the

frequency with which a person exercises, since

those who buy two or more pairs of running

shoes each year tend to exercise more often

than those who buy at most one pair.

(E) Reading to children at an early age should

inspire them to read on their own later, since

studies have shown that children who have not

been read to are less likely to develop an

interest in reading than children who have been

read to.

When you see "flawed pattern of reasoning", the first thing you need to do is to figure out what flaw it is. The author here apparently wants to establish a cause-effect relationship, but he/she got a complete 180: taking the effect as cause. Students who are good at math (above average score) are more likely to take advanced math courses, not the other way around.

D presents a same logic flaw: reversed cause-effect relationship. People who like running would be more likely to buy running shoes.

E presents a legitimate case of causation. And another point of unparallelness is that chirldren are READ to, which is not their own action. In the stimulus both score high and selection of advanced courses are one's own action.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-12 5:08:04编辑过]

icewarm

You will figure out the game. Just pay more attention to the initial conditions and try to get all the inference.

icewarm

Something is wrong with the editing and I cannot fix it.

Sorry, it looks messy.

临江仙

好详细，佩服！

补充一小点：RC 12, 选项C还错在“often”. Puerto Rican的例子里，line54只说"occasionally contained some Spanish"。

建议：买Powerscore的2004 LSAT Deconstructed，里面有2004年的三套题和全部解释。加上LSAC的SuperPrep一起看，很有帮助。

ivy3997

thank u guys, so much appreciation

i have looked for this book mentioned above, but it seems that only Amazon has one.

do u have used one?

for the game question.

My PROBLEM is I was thinking they were asking me the full possibility that the F may apply for, but it seems that the answer matches the one meaning only one of them.

so it is the problem

Does this question type in other situations not mean the full probabilities?

takkioranger

我之前也有过同样的问题，后来发现这种题一般有两种问法

1 which of the following *** each of which could be ***

   这种问题就是将每个选项中每一个元素单独考虑，比如这道game题如果这么问的话，选项给出X，Y，Z就是正确的

2 which of the following is an accurate and complete ******

  类似这种问法就表明每一个选项就是针对某一种情况的，其中的元素不能分开来考虑，他们是一个组合，这道game题的原题就是

 这个意思，所以不能选xyz

ivy3997

thanks, fully-understanding the question is so important...

No doubt I was in confusion...