ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1611|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问prep破解版一题(30767-!-item-!-188;#058&004308)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-8 19:51:00 | 只看该作者

问prep破解版一题(30767-!-item-!-188;#058&004308)

118.
   
(30767-!-item-!-188;#058&004308)

初步分析后还是有疑问,请NN大虾们多多指点。请看下面的疑问:

It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.

(A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise -正确答案 [A中的第一个it 不知道指代什么,似乎是指代后面的that从句做主语?? 所以我就认为一个句子里的多个it指代的事物不一致,因此认为A错,可A确恰恰是正确答案,为啥呢?]

(A) It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise -正确答案 [A中的第一个it 不知道指代什么,似乎是指代后面的that从句做主语?? 所以我就认为一个句子里的多个it指代的事物不一致,因此认为A错,可A确恰恰是正确答案,为啥呢?]

(B) It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and under her command it had won high praise【红色部分与前面的it moved into 不平行

(C) Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command【C是否错在it? 是否因为it语法上应该指代主语中心词:publisher?但逻辑上该代词it指代the washingtong Post

(D) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command

(E) Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command

【E我以为是现在分词引导成分与后面的主语the washington Post 是可以一致的,。。。不过,重新细细的看的话,E中红色的部分似乎很有问题。。。语义有问题的。。】

我选择E


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-8 20:48:29编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-9-8 20:26:00 | 只看该作者
我认为所有格后面是不能加ing形式的,您觉得呢?
同一个句子中的it是指的同一事物。因为有了后面的WP了,前面就用it代替。并不是主语从句的说……
请您指教……
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-8 20:49:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用eaglegrace在2007-9-8 20:26:00的发言:
我认为所有格后面是不能加ing形式的,您觉得呢?
同一个句子中的it是指的同一事物。因为有了后面的WP了,前面就用it代替。并不是主语从句的说……
请您指教……

不太明白,还是。。。

地板
发表于 2007-9-8 20:55:00 | 只看该作者
哦,没说清楚……我觉得这句话改成正常语序应该是这样的: WP moved into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham became publisher of it 因为要与后面的and it was under her command平行,所以改成了现在的语序。但是it的指代对象没有变,还是WP
5#
发表于 2007-9-8 20:58:00 | 只看该作者
Katharine Graham's becoming,OG中说所有格后面是不可以加ing形式的,具体哪一题我想不起来了,但是有这个规则。哪位能想起来提示一下……
6#
发表于 2013-1-15 11:30:08 | 只看该作者
居然五年后来留言、、A选项是两个强调句并列。读的时候可以把It was that 省略。然后剩下的it只能指代washington post。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-24 10:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部