ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2001|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

百思不得其解的变态结构 GMATPrep-57

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-29 16:58:00 | 只看该作者

百思不得其解的变态结构 GMATPrep-57

The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were connected by a complex regional system of roads.

 

 

(A) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were

(B) with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,

(C) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms, each that had been

(D) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms and with each(B)

(E) of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms each had been

这道烂题的with结构和of结构分别是修饰什么的呢?整个句子的结构我一直想不明白 希望NN给点指导 谢先

这道烂题的with结构和of结构分别是修饰什么的呢?整个句子的结构我一直想不明白 希望NN给点指导 谢先


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-29 18:26:04编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-29 18:25:00 | 只看该作者

不好意思忘了给答案 答案是B

板凳
发表于 2007-8-30 00:53:00 | 只看该作者

My opinion:

First the meaning:

There are more than 75 carefully engineered structures were built at Chaco Canyon. And each structure has up to 600 rooms . 

And,

The clause " of up to 600 rooms each" XIAN DING "engineered structures" And "connected by a complex regional system of roads." XIU SHI  engineered structures.

I can't type Chinese now. Sorry.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-30 10:17:00 | 只看该作者

如果of修饰structures,那么这两个短语中间就不应该有逗号啊,应该直接修饰的。

 

5#
发表于 2007-8-30 12:21:00 | 只看该作者

帮顶,

个人觉得这里是个同位语结构,

6#
发表于 2007-8-31 00:44:00 | 只看该作者

I think so. of up to 600 rooms each. 是同位语结构.

It is wrong to mean XIAN DING between " of up to 600 rooms each" and "engineered structures".

I got sth by reading this topic:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=26199&page=2#top.

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-31 09:24:00 | 只看该作者
哪位NN可以帮忙指点一下,这里的of结构是和什么同位呢 不太明白啊 多谢多谢多谢
8#
发表于 2007-8-31 09:51:00 | 只看该作者

 of up to 600 rooms each ,connected by a complex regional system of roads.

这两部分都是修饰structures的,两者并列

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-31 10:07:00 | 只看该作者

connected这里修饰的是structures吗?我一直一位动词的过去分词放在句末就是默认修饰句子主语的呢。

如果不是这样的话,它的修饰对象怎样确定?

10#
发表于 2007-8-31 10:53:00 | 只看该作者

如果修饰主语,放在最后不符合ets的clarity原则

我理解connected就相当于structures的补足语,从意思上来说这样也比较clear

不过或许我理解得不对

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-6 20:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部