ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2922|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep中代词指代的原则讨论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-21 23:58:00 | 只看该作者

prep中代词指代的原则讨论

最近在看prep,发现对代词的指代和OG有很大的区别,甚至于多次出现可以指代所有格,所以想请教高人对指代的正确定律。

1、是否应该使用“就近指代原则”,假如因为”就近指代原则“导致逻辑指代问题,是否算错?

2、是否“相同代词在同一句中(包括主句、从句)只能指代同一对象(形式主语的it例外)?

3、代词指代所有格是否已不再是必错?

下面是我在看注释版时的一种相驳的指代想法,自己都不知道那个对,那个错,还是两个都不对。

15. Recently documented examples of neurogenesis(神经形成), the production of new brain cells, include the brain growing in mice when placed in a stimulating environment or neurons increasing in canaries that learn new songs.

 

 

 

A. the brain growing in mice when placed in a stimulating environment or neurons increasing in canaries that

B. mice whose brains grow when they are placed in a stimulating environment or canaries whose neurons increase when they

C. mice's brains that grow when they are placed in a stimulating environment or canaries' neurons that increase when they

D. the brain growth in mice when placed in a stimulating environment or the increase in canaries' neurons when they

E. brain growth in mice that are placed in a stimulating environment or an increase in neurons in canaries that

A: when placed优先作为主句的状从,placed逻辑主语是examples而不是邻近的mice,句意错;根据原文逻辑意思是增长的结果而不是过程,所以动名词growingincreasing应该改成名词growthincrease

B: they指代不明,可以指代brainsmice;第二个they和第一个they不是一个对象(关于此点,个人认为多个相同代词应该指代同一对象应该是限定在同一主句内;代词指代是否应优先限定在句子部分内,如此题的定从内,不同的从句内的代词如非有同一主句应该可以指代各自不同的主句主语对象;如第一个they在第一个定从内的状从里,应优先指代定从内的主句主语brains产生逻辑意思错误,第二个they优先指代其所在定从内的主句主语neurons同样产生逻辑意思错误)。

C: they指代brains不对;第二个they和第一个they不是一个对象(参考B的个人观点)。

D: when placed的逻辑主语是production而不是邻近的mice,句意错;they的指代错误,they应该指canaries,但这里是所有格,无法指代,将使得they指代neurons等造成逻辑错误。

E: correct,留意that are placed是为了和后面的that learn形式上平行,否则应该省略为placed更简洁;原文有状从和定从两种,所以改为that定从不算改变原文。

 

 

 

注意:句意理解清楚才能选出答案,而不能仅依赖语法结构的形式平行


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-22 0:35:40编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-21 23:59:00 | 只看该作者

19. Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.

A. while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

B. while at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants that have

C. while they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time, which have

D. but introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants at the same time that have

E. but at the same time introducing some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having

 

 

 

A: 两个they不是指代同一个对象;原句while从句和since从句各有一个they,且均为主句的状从,所以两个they应指代相同的主句主语methods,导致since状从逻辑意思错误;having在句末有作伴随或结果状语的可能。

B: correct;改为that定从修饰pollutants使得since从句变为that从句内的状从,所以since状从内的they优先指代其所在主句that定从的主语that,也即对应指代pollutants,逻辑意思合理。

C: 两个they不是指代同一个对象,根据上面推理,这个选项似乎也对?还是因为第二个they在which定从但此定从却是修饰while状从的pollutants,所以应与while状从里的第一个they属于同一主句内,只能指代同一对象,导致出现逻辑错误?还是可能这个推理和15题想法都错误??

D: but不能引导条件状语从句

E: 同上

 

 

 

注意:

1、              出现两个选项一个有代词,一个没有代词,需要比较代词是否有指代错误或重复

2、              条件状语从句的省略:When/while(时间)/if/unless(条件)/even though/even if/although(让步)/once+名词/形容词/完整句

52题正确选项的第二个her指代所有格。

52. (27251-!-item-!-188;#058&003145)
In addition to her work on the Miocene hominid fossil record, Mary Leakey contributed to
archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstakingly
documenting East African cave paintings.
(A) Leakey contributed to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid
activity and painstakingly documenting
(B) Leakey contributed to archaeology by her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid
activity and by painstakingly documenting
(C) Leakey was a contributor to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of
hominid activity and with her painstaking documentation of
(D) Leakey's contributions to archaeology include her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of
hominid activity and her painstaking documentation of
(E) Leakey's contributions to archaeology include discovering the earliest direct evidence of
hominid activity and painstaking documentation of
考点: 平行对称(Parallelism)
1) and, but等连词出现的时候,一定要注意前后平行
(A) and前后不平行,前者是名词discovery,后者是动名词documenting;with用于此处意思不准确。
(B) and前后不平行,名词discovery和动名词documenting不平行
(C) 使用contributor改变了原句的意思,with意思太广泛,不如include表达意思精确
(D) 正确, and前后平行都是名词discovery, documentation
(E) and前后不平行,前者是动名词discovering,后者是名词documentation
句子结构: In addition to… ,Mary Leakey’s contributions… include her discovery of…and her
painstaking documentation of…


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-22 0:33:29编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2007-8-22 00:37:00 | 只看该作者

个人的建议:不要在GAMT的代词用法上太花时间,这个和时态是GAMT语法中变化最多,也最没有一定规律的。

建议在做PrepSC时,不要一开始就把代词用法做为排除的主要依据。

两个NN的帖子供大家参考:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=3287

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=43552&star=1#368835


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-22 0:39:52编辑过]
地板
发表于 2007-8-22 00:58:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用crowkiller在2007-8-22 0:37:00的发言:

个人的建议:不要在GAMT的代词用法上太花时间,这个和时态是GAMT语法中变化最多,也最没有一定规律的。

建议在做PrepSC时,不要一开始就把代词用法做为排除的主要依据。

两个NN的帖子供大家参考:

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=3287

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=43552&star=1#368835


re, thanks for the link. very useful.

避轻就重,小心上当

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-25 00:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部