ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: faustino
打印 上一主题 下一主题

T-4-Q31

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-1-25 08:32:35 | 只看该作者
UP一下这道题啦 production可以provide吗? 这个平行以后逻辑上说不通啊 谢谢啦!!!
-- by 会员 zjqswmm (2010/1/19 8:29:37)



还是没人回答吗?
12#
发表于 2010-1-25 09:56:43 | 只看该作者
As sources of electrical power, windmills now account for only about 2,500 megawatts nationwide, but production is almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide enough electricity for 1.3 million households.

A) almost expected to double by the end of the year, which would provide

B) almost expected that it will double by the end of the year, thus providing

C) expected that it will almost double by the end of the year to provide

D)expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide

E)  expected almost to double by the end of the year, which would thus be providing

almost逻辑上应该是指的double,而不是expect,所以A B 错;GMAT里 ,which 不能修饰前面整句话,A E错了;expected that it will中it 和前面的production是重复的,B c 错。

不过我觉得那个平行来判断thus to provide 感觉不能作为第一判据吧,一般都是连词连接两三个并列成分,如and,or,conversely,neither nor,not but,等连接主宾表状等成分,才要求并列,那个 thus是个副词,连接的不是相同成分吧
13#
发表于 2010-10-12 20:46:10 | 只看该作者
ding
14#
发表于 2010-10-15 20:12:40 | 只看该作者
我这道题也做错了,不过review的时候是这样想的:

B、C中that后头的it指代模糊,容易产生歧义,不好,去BC
D、E相似。两个比较中D比E例的“which would thus be providing”好,去E

我错选了A,但是总结前头大家的分析,逗号后的which逻辑上是表示前头说production会double这一整句话,但是语法上which不能指代一整句话,故D比A好。

求NN们指点!
15#
发表于 2011-8-30 15:58:52 | 只看该作者
正确答案expected almost to double by the end of the year and thus to provide

almost是不是应该放在to后面啊 囧
16#
发表于 2011-8-30 16:04:37 | 只看该作者
expect正确的用法是expect that和expect to do
it is expected that是错误的用法
另外almost修饰对象错误
17#
发表于 2012-2-5 11:38:45 | 只看该作者
我做这题的时候,第一反应是D,但是看到了thus to provide 觉得好奇怪啊,不是thus都应该跟现在分词的吗????google了也没有这类的解答......疑惑.......
18#
发表于 2013-1-14 21:48:15 | 只看该作者
B整句话理解就是,production可能会或者不会double,结果providing……但实际是如果production不double,就不会providing。所以almost修饰double的多少更合理。
19#
发表于 2014-4-27 15:44:12 | 只看该作者
Also, the usage expected that it will almost double seems to be awkward. Although the usage of expected that is tempting BUT the usage of IT creates a confusion

Production is expected that IT double by....
OR
Production is expected to double by...

Which one seems better?
20#
发表于 2014-4-27 15:47:03 | 只看该作者
我们可以说 production is expected to provide
但是 production本身是不能 provide的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 18:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部