ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: fufu
打印 上一主题 下一主题

885 sec e, 17

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2007-2-10 05:23:00 | 只看该作者
但是C将republican senators 改为 republincans了啊,我正是由于这个才排除了C。不明白!
12#
发表于 2007-6-23 01:48:00 | 只看该作者

what's wrong with E?

anyone can tell me? thanks

13#
发表于 2007-6-27 02:20:00 | 只看该作者
UP
14#
发表于 2007-6-27 02:24:00 | 只看该作者

(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women (senators)

here, can senators be omitted in order to make a parallel structure? then, senators who are moderate Republicans and women senators are compared. so i choose E. what's wrong with it?                                                                                                                                  

15#
发表于 2007-6-27 23:38:00 | 只看该作者
up~ 555
16#
发表于 2007-7-3 03:36:00 | 只看该作者
why does no one answer me?
17#
发表于 2008-5-24 10:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用swmoon在2007-6-27 2:24:00的发言:

(E) wished for more senators who are moderate Republicans than women (senators)

here, can senators be omitted in order to make a parallel structure? then, senators who are moderate Republicans and women senators are compared. so i choose E. what's wrong with it?                                                                                                                                  

it seems ok, i also picked the answer E. After reading C again, I find the idiom "not so ... as..." is much better.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-11 19:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部