ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 16149|回复: 36
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 41

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-25 21:35:00 | 只看该作者

OG 41

41. Under a provision of the Constitution that was never applied. Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.
(A)    was never applied, Congress has been required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do it
(B)    was never applied, there has been a requirement that Congress call a convention for consideration of possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(C)    was never applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention for considering possible amendments to the document when asked to do it formally
(D)    has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
(E)    has never been applied. Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so
The predicate has never been applied refers to a span of time, from the writing of the Constitution to the present, rather than to a past event (as was does), and the phrase is required indicates that the provision still applies.
这句解释我不明白,我还以为是从 never上看出要用完成时态的,可是为什么og的解释说,是从is required看出呢?
沙发
发表于 2003-11-25 21:59:00 | 只看该作者
它是说谓语has never been applied 值得是一段时间(从the writing of ...倒现在)而不是指过去的事件,is required 表明the provision 仍然实施着
板凳
发表于 2003-11-25 23:40:00 | 只看该作者
这个题目好象也是在刘振民的语法书里看到过,大概的解释还记得。

1、你要看到do后面用的代词。如果是指代某一个具体的名词,可以用it来指代。如果是指代前面提到的一个动作,就不可以用it。而应该用so来指代。如:
  He ate a chicken, so did I.
  通过这一条就过滤出,只有E和D是可以用的。

2、whereby显然是多余的,就过滤出E了。

一般情况下,最好不要使用时态来过滤答案。如果一定要修改时态的话,要注意刘振民说的几点。
1)有明显的时间状语
2)未划线部分的提示
3)从句意上理解(此点比较难,小心使用)
地板
发表于 2004-2-22 15:08:00 | 只看该作者
Under    a    provision    of    the    Constitution    that    has    never    been    applied.    Congress    is    required    to    call    a    convention    to    consider    possible    amendments    to    the    document    when    formally    asked    to    do    so
by    the    legislatures    of    two-thirds    of    the    states.


Under    a    provision    of    the    Constitution    that    has    never    been    applied.    主谓语是什么?这好像只是一个介宾短语啊?

5#
发表于 2004-2-22 20:54:00 | 只看该作者
对,Under a provision of the Constitution that has never been applied就是一个做状语的介词短语under a provision..., Congress is required to ...。that引导的是a provision的定语从句。congress前是逗号。
6#
发表于 2004-2-26 00:11:00 | 只看该作者
原来题目有误,谢谢tianwan
7#
发表于 2004-6-30 22:03:00 | 只看该作者
在OG上解释这题D的答案也有语法错误,可是我没看出来,高手指点一下,谢谢了.
8#
发表于 2004-7-1 11:38:00 | 只看该作者
NN们,不要都躲起来嘛
9#
发表于 2004-7-1 12:07:00 | 只看该作者

D. Under a provision of the Constitution that has never been applied, whereby Congress is required to call a convention to consider possible amendments to the document when formally asked to do so by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states.

flywood, 请问该句的主句在哪里啊?

10#
发表于 2004-7-1 23:35:00 | 只看该作者
是没有主句,但除了这个错以外,OG的解释还说有时态错误,没看出时态错哪,请指示,先谢谢大美女了.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-7 19:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部