ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

As a result of a supernova explosion, every human being on Earth was bombarded on February 23, 1987, by about 100 billion neutrinos; fortunately, neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions and that interact very weakly with matter.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5464|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]prep1-42

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-17 22:53:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]prep1-42

42.       (26647-!-item-!-188;#058&002738)

 

As a result of a supernova explosion, every human being on Earth was bombarded on February 23, 1987, by about 100 billion neutrinos; fortunately, neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions and that interact very weakly with matter.

 

(A) neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions and that

(B) neutrinos, which are harmless, are elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions and which

(C) neutrinos are harmless elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions and which

(D) these harmless elementary particles are produced in nuclear reactions, and neutrinos

(E) these elementary particles, harmless products of nuclear reactions, are neutrinos that

answer is A

why not  c? so many thx!

沙发
发表于 2007-7-17 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

(A) neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that
            
are produced in nuclear reactions and that  平行

(C) neutrinos are harmless elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions and which     不平行

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-17 23:08:00 | 只看该作者
thx ar!
地板
发表于 2007-7-20 20:37:00 | 只看该作者
E为什么不行了
5#
发表于 2007-12-16 17:42:00 | 只看该作者
同问,为什么E不对?“these无指代”不理解。
6#
发表于 2007-12-16 17:50:00 | 只看该作者

顶上去,恳请哪位nn解答一下。

7#
发表于 2008-1-3 09:53:00 | 只看该作者

不是nn,说说我的想法

E选将原来的主语neutrinos变为了particles

又将原来形容neutrinosharmless
            
products
            
of
            
nuclear
            
reactions

变成了可有可无的插入句

不知道这样子句子重心的变换
        
足够当排除选项的理由吗?

 

另外原句that interact very weakly
            
with
            
matter
修饰的是particles

E选变为修饰neutrinos

另外我认为,these无明确指代是因为本句用;与前一句隔开后

一开头就说这些粒子怎么样,可是没人知道是什么粒子啊

有错请指正

8#
发表于 2008-6-12 08:21:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
发表于 2008-6-28 17:25:00 | 只看该作者

请问这里DE these无指代对象就是因为前面是; 从而失去指代对象吗?

10#
发表于 2009-9-13 16:56:00 | 只看该作者

同问:DE中these没有明确指代。不理解??

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 00:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部