Prep1-119 句子重心改变是有效性错误吗？

dduckii

119.
                (30813-!-item-!-188;#058&004319)

 

Due to automobile-related jobs in the 1920's employing one of every eight workers, the automobile industry dominated the American economy.

 

(A) Due to automobile-related jobs in the 1920's employing one of every eight workers, the automobile industry dominated the American economy.

(B) One out of every eight workers were employed in automobile-related jobs in the 1920's, with the American economy being dominated by the automobile industry.

(C) The automobile industry dominated the American economy in the 1920's, with one of every eight workers having been employed in automobile-related jobs.

(D) In the 1920's, the automobile industry had dominated the American economy, when one out of every eight workers was employed in an automobile-related job.

(E) In the 1920's, the automobile industry dominated the American economy, with one out of every eight workers employed in an automobile-related job.

正确答案是E 

原本作题的时候是这个想法：

１due to...一般不用　排除　A

２one out of every eight workers... 应该是与单数谓语相搭配 B排除

3 in the 1920's 状语提前　句子重心改变　排除DE

于是我选了C

但是后来分析后，　发现C确实是时态上面很有问题automobile industry dominated ，后面却跟着eight workers having been employed

我的疑惑在于：　E　既然句子重心转移　为什么仍然是正确答案

　　　　　　　　在以前的题目中，我往往使用排除状语提前这种方法　都没有什么错的．．．

　　　　　　　　Effectiveness的错误优先级该是什么呢？

jonesfj

我认为不是句子重心改变的问题,而是主句和从句的问题,主句应该得以突出或强调,原句感觉头重脚轻了,好象OG上有这种问题的解释,但不记得具体怎么说的了,还望高人指点!

dduckii

jonesfj 回复真快啊

我是上过XDF 翻出当时的笔记是有写Effectiveness错误之二　强调中心发生转移

例句是　I was born in 1979

              In 1979, I was born

笔记中还有说这种虽然是违反Effectiveness，但是当成correctiveness处理的错误

就有重心改变这一说

虽然说xdf的东西不是都对，但是有些还是值得借鉴的

特此翻出笔记　诚心求教

jonesfj

我觉得还是从句意上理解吧，你没感觉到原句的头重脚轻吗？

Ｂ里的being dominated ，Ｃ里的having been employed 有问题，Ｄ里的was employed 有问题，以及用when 引导的从句句意有问题，即使正确的话，时间顺序也应该是＂每八个工人中有一个从事汽车行业＂在先，才能证明＂汽车工业已经在美国经济中居主导地位＂时间在后，时态有问题，再说，In the 1920's的时间状语应该用一般过去式啊，怎么会用起过去完成时了？Ｅ里的with表伴随吧！

哎呀，我也不是很清楚了，我们等高手来解答哈

jonesfj

我也翻了下ＸＤＦ的笔记，上面写的是“句子的强调重心发生彻底改变一定错”具体解释是：把句子的主干改成从属成分，从属成分改成主干。

这题我认为句子的主干就是the automobile industry dominated the American economy哈，Ｅ没有改变句子强调的重心啊。

ＸＤＦ的规律讲的好象另一种题，是医生用器械来诊断病情，有个答案写的是器械自己来诊断病情，改变的句子强调的重心，记不到原题了，你翻翻看。

你使用的排除状语提前这种方法，我认为好象有点武断哈，最主要的还应该回到句子的原意上来吧，你说呢？

smartsky11

12

天蝎座1107

119.
                (30813-!-item-!-188;#058&004319)

 

 

Due to automobile-related jobs in the 1920's employing one of every eight workers, the automobile industry dominated the American economy.
                

 

 

(A) Due to automobile-related jobs in the 1920's employing one of every eight workers, the automobile industry dominated the American economy. 错在due to后面很冗长 而且realted jobs不能发出employing的主动动作

(B) One out of every eight workers were employed in automobile-related jobs in the 1920's, with the American economy being dominated by the automobile industry. with结构后面的being done错 直接说with sth. done就可以了 原来句子的因果关系在这个句子里体现错误 虽然with也有表示原因的意思 这里不仅句子重心改变 因果也颠倒

(C) The automobile industry dominated the American economy in the 1920's, with one of every eight workers having been employed in automobile-related jobs. 同样with sth. having been done错 时态错

(D) In the 1920's, the automobile industry had dominated the American economy, when one out of every eight workers was employed in an automobile-related job. 无故变成过去完成时 无故加了when造成歧义 让人理解为当XXX，the automobile industry 才怎样怎样

(E) In the 1920's, the automobile industry dominated the American economy, with one out of every eight workers employed in an automobile-related job. AlienX斑斑说过with可怡表示因果 Longman上也有解释 4
because of a particular feeling or physical state
They were trembling with fear. Jack beamed with pleasure when he heard the news. I was too weak with hunger to cry. Mother became seriously ill with pneumonia. 所以这里E选项和A选项的意思是一样 with后面又用了独立主格 with sb. done

soul86

楼上回答很详细，谢谢！

chenche8827

想问下，这里E的emloyed不会是修饰workers的么，8个里面有1个被雇佣，和8个雇佣的里面有1个，是不是歧义啊

FIRST325

想问下，这里E的emloyed不会是修饰workers的么，8个里面有1个被雇佣，和8个雇佣的里面有1个，是不是歧义啊

-- by 会员 chenche8827 (2011/5/10 11:32:15)

i agree with her. so how different? i confused? help me thanks a lot