ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 13007|回复: 34
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 89

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-23 10:36:00 | 只看该作者

OG 89

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
every thirty-two pupils now have one micro­computer, four times as many than there were
every thirty-two pupils now has one microcom­puter, four times as many as
Choices A, B, and C appropriately use the construction "one X for every thirty-two Y's" to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.

Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.这是什么意思呢?为什么会有学生相比呢?不明白啊???

能讲讲吗?谢谢。
沙发
发表于 2003-11-23 21:53:00 | 只看该作者
D补全后是: every thirty-two pupils now have one micro­computer, (every thirty-two pupils) [are] four times as many than there were


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-23 21:54:30编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-26 12:18:00 | 只看该作者
为什么不能是:

every thirty-two pupils now have one micro­computer, (compuer is ) four times as many than there were




地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-11-27 11:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-26 12:18:00的发言:
为什么不能是:

  every thirty-two pupils now have one micro­computer, (compuer is ) four times as many than there were




这个还是没懂,能讲讲吗?谢谢。
5#
发表于 2003-11-28 05:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-26 12:18:00的发言:
为什么不能是:

  every thirty-two pupils now have one micro­computer, (compuer is ) four times as many than there were






呵呵,你是不是忘记平行结构啦。
首先至少应该是 (computer is ) four times as many as it was
而且这样的话省略的是computer,和前面句子得主语并不相同,因此是不能省略的。


C: [there is] now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as [there were]

E: every thirty-two pupils now has one micro­computer, four times as many as <-- 改为as many as they did。但是这样的话理解一下句意,four times其实指的是一种状况,而非强调pupil的动作。这样也是不如C来的好的。

不过我有点想不通的是,为什么用there were而不是there was呢?难道是four times在作怪?





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-11-28 6:02:41编辑过]
6#
发表于 2003-11-28 15:33:00 | 只看该作者
已经讨论过一回了,
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=26698
可是我还是不太明白,觉得这可能是英语的一种习惯用法,希望高人能再解答一下。
7#
发表于 2004-6-25 10:31:00 | 只看该作者

为什么不能是:

  every thirty-two pupils now have one micro&shy;computer, (compuer is ) four times as many than there were


为什么不能是there was ?


谢谢


8#
发表于 2004-6-25 13:16:00 | 只看该作者

顶顶


请大家帮助

9#
发表于 2004-7-12 08:57:00 | 只看该作者
我认为这道题A/D区别关键在于A的表达是比例,而D/E的表达是具体数字,那么从逻辑上只能是代表32的数字可以是其他数字的4倍,而代表1的数字无法合理地成为整数的4倍。
10#
发表于 2004-7-12 09:04:00 | 只看该作者

感觉"含数字的主语+谓语,as many as/more than+省略句"这类句型的比较首先指向主语。如果要指向宾语觉得","可省。且此题D理解成one computer four times as many (as)than there were似乎没有什么意思,不可能理解为一个计算机是1/4计算机的四倍。答案C是个比例没有这种歧义。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 02:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部