ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants' skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying Africa's forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3855|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd18-19关于for和to的用法区别

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-27 07:21:00 | 只看该作者

gwd18-19关于for和to的用法区别

20: GWD-18-Q19

New genetic evidence—together with recent studies of elephants’ skeletons, tusks, and other anatomical features—provide compelling support for classifying
            Africa’s forest elephants and its savanna elephants as separate species.

 

  1. provide compelling support for classifying

  2. provide compelling support for the classification of

  3. provides compelling support to the classification of

  4. provides compelling support for classifying

  5. provides compelling support to classify

我记得og160里面有题目说到for/ to的区别,for后面表目的最好是名词,而不是动词+ing。当时有的nn局的例子是:

i came to the US for studying. i go to restaurant for dinner.

那位nn能来看看?我还是觉得e比d好。

沙发
发表于 2007-6-27 08:14:00 | 只看该作者
New genetic evidence不是classify的动作发出者吧?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-27 08:53:00 | 只看该作者

很有道理啊。。。

那就是说在表示目的,并且动作是逻辑主语发出的时候才用to,不能用for。

 thanks, s7s7!!!!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 02:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部