ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: benbenaa
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD30-2 大家帮帮忙吧,就快考了

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2008-6-17 10:01:00 | 只看该作者
up
12#
发表于 2009-3-13 02:30:00 | 只看该作者
up
13#
发表于 2009-6-25 15:06:00 | 只看该作者
UP
14#
发表于 2009-6-25 15:08:00 | 只看该作者

B中to stalk...and get...

个人觉得get前要加个to才平行啊,to stalk...and to get...所以C满足了平行了啊

15#
发表于 2009-6-25 15:26:00 | 只看该作者

to stalk...表目的所以用不定式,而to与in order to相比更简洁

应该是so to stalk...and (to understood) get close enough...

to stalk与to get是并列表目的的,the to before get is understood and does not need to be repeated. OG里也常出现这种情况

16#
发表于 2009-6-25 15:31:00 | 只看该作者
thank you MM
17#
发表于 2009-7-2 13:38:00 | 只看该作者

Caribou are wary animals with excellent hearing, so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it with nothing but a handheld lance, as Dorset people did, required exceptional hunting skill.

 

  1. so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it-1,分词做主语相对强调动作本身,不如使用不定式好;2,分词之间没有连词;3,it没有指代对象;
  2. so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
  3. so in order to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one-in order to...结构做状语,句子没有主语(这里不是不定式做目的状语和in order to之间的区别,而是要求使用不定式做主语:to stalk...and get...required exceptional...);
  4. and so in order to stalk it over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it-and多余,it没有指代;
  5. and so stalking them over the treeless landscape and getting close enough in order to kill it
18#
发表于 2009-7-2 16:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Zeldaw在2007-5-14 23:44:00的发言:
  1. so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
      
  2. so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
      
  3. so in order to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
      
  4. and so in order to stalk it over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
       
  5. and so stalking them over the treeless landscape and getting close enough in order to kill it

A, D,E的it 均无指代对象

the only difference bwtween b and c is 'in order to' and 'to'

不定式表目的

to更简洁

我觉得这边的不定式未必表示目的,可能就是一种动词变名词结构的方式,表示做这件事情。。。
19#
发表于 2009-7-28 09:41:00 | 只看该作者
20#
发表于 2009-10-7 17:30:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得A.D.E都错在it 没有指代,并且so表“所以”时是做连词的不能和and连用。 排除A.D.E

再者, in order to.....结构后缺少动作主语,所以C错。应表达为in order to....,sb do sth.  排除C 

所以选B

请问NN这样理解对吗?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 03:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部