以下是引用5m21在2008-10-30 21:24:00的发言:看OG对B项错误的解释 B :that had flourished at the same time as had the civilizations B就补出了助动词had,但解释说as后面的had是redundant and unnecessary的,就是说这种情况不是 不补出助动词也可以,而是根本就不能补?
btw 如果D改成 flourshing at the same time as that did 那就对了?这种 n + 分词定语从句中 可以把flourishing看成动词的过去式吗? 用did 代替 flourishing? 怎么这么别扭 主语比较时助动词补出多余,B就算补出也不应该补had,而是did D改成flourshing at the same time as that did flourshing也不对。不能用于修饰an ancient civilization ,Ving强调动作持续到现在,明显不对,应该用that flourshed.虽然did补出与flourshed对应,但是主语比较,助动词无需补出,多余
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-12-7 19:34:18编辑过] |