大全326题（OG62)
62. Geologists believe that the warning signs for a major earthquake may include sudden fluctuations in local seismic activity, tilting and other deformations of the Earth’s crust, changing the measured strain across a fault zone, and varying the electrical properties of underground rocks.
(A) changing the measured strain across a fault zone and varying
(B) changing measurements of the strain across a fault zone, and varying
(C) changing the strain as measured across a fault zone, and variations of
(D) changes in the measured strain across a fault zone, and variations in（D）
(E) changes in measurements of the strain across a fault zone, and variations among
D, the best choice, describes the warning signs in parallel phrases. Despite surface appearances, the nouns changes and variations are parallel with tilting, but the verbal forms changing and varying in A, B, and C are not: tilting, one of the deformations of the Earth’s crust, is used here as a noun that is parallel to fluctuations, whereas changing and varying are used as verbs indicating some action undertaken. Moreover, these verbs are used incorrectly because the sentence mentions no subject that is performing these actions.
请问：本句中为什么不能认为划线前是一个AND链接的三项名词并列结构（因为看到AND这个并列标志，又看到后面的OTHER，就以为是完整的并列结构），而划线部分是分词形式作表结果的伴随状语，OG的解释说因为两个分词的动词没有动作发出者，为什么不能认为是other deformations 发出的？
相关链接http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=53732&page=1
有人认为:
以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-4 20:35:00的发言：
1，从意思上，tilting and other deformations 是一个范畴，所以这个and不能和sudden fluctuations并列。
2，the warning signs for a major earthquake 是主语，所以后面的分词只能用中心词signs作逻辑主语。
我有不同见解:
1.tilting和other deformations怎么是一个范畴呢?前者是"倾斜",后者包括"压扁、粉碎．．．"
不一样啊！故我认为＂这个and可以和sudden fluctuations并列＂．
如果tianwwan所说正确，那么设想一下这种情况：原题划线部分以及其后所有内容都不存在，那么如何表达？
难道这样：Geologists believe that the warning signs for a major earthquake may include sudden fluctuations in local seismic activity and tilting and other deformations of the Earth’s crust．
2.逻辑主语一定要跟主句的主语一致？好象没有这种说发吧．
与楼主不同，我觉得逻辑主语可以是other deformations，故划线部分如果以"changing"开头，也没什么错．
3.咱不是研究地震的，从一个外行的角度来看该题，A也能说得通：deformations改变strain并且改变了electrical properties.
实际上该题我选了B,原因有2个: 划线部分是伴随状语;B选项本身的"平行结构"很完整.
4.疑问：仅仅２个对象并列时是不是只能用 ＂a and b＂ 形式？ 而不可以在and之前加逗号？就象该题,B选项里的那个逗号是不允许的?
5.怀疑: 该题中tilting and other deformations如果改为tilting or other deformations,那么答案毫无疑问就是D了,不是吗? 难道......该题是故意制造歧意?
还请各路大侠为我解惑啊,谢谢!
以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-4 20:35:00的发言：
1，从意思上，tilting and other deformations 是一个范畴，所以这个and不能和sudden fluctuations并列。
2，the warning signs for a major earthquake 是主语，所以后面的分词只能用中心词signs作逻辑主语。
我有不同见解:
1.tilting和other deformations怎么是一个范畴呢?前者是"倾斜",后者包括"压扁、粉碎．．．"
不一样啊！故我认为＂这个and可以和sudden fluctuations并列＂．
如果tianwwan所说正确，那么设想一下这种情况：原题划线部分以及其后所有内容都不存在，那么如何表达？
难道这样：Geologists believe that the warning signs for a major earthquake may include sudden fluctuations in local seismic activity and tilting and other deformations of the Earth’s crust．
2.逻辑主语一定要跟主句的主语一致？好象没有这种说发吧．
与楼主不同，我觉得逻辑主语可以是other deformations，故划线部分如果以"changing"开头，也没什么错．
3.咱不是研究地震的，从一个外行的角度来看该题，A也能说得通：deformations改变strain并且改变了electrical properties.
实际上该题我选了B,原因有2个: 划线部分是伴随状语;B选项本身的"平行结构"很完整.
4.疑问：仅仅２个对象并列时是不是只能用 ＂a and b＂ 形式？ 而不可以在and之前加逗号？就象该题,B选项里的那个逗号是不允许的?
5.怀疑: 该题中tilting and other deformations如果改为tilting or other deformations,那么答案毫无疑问就是D了,不是吗? 难道......该题是故意制造歧意?
还请各路大侠为我解惑啊,谢谢!
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-4-24 20:30:00
楼主
