About these issues: 1. Very tough issue. There is no medical conclusion on this and it is the heart of the debate, especially since fetus are able to live on their own (with medical support) at 6-7 months of "age." Supporters of Roe v. Wade view abortion as a. women's bodily integrity b. the inequity of gender roles/power struggle c. government's interference in private affairs Dissenters view abortion as a. killing of a human being (unborn=human) b. implicit assumption that women who seek abortion are sexually immoral, irresonposible, and selfish 2. Same Sex Marriage Supporters: view it as an issue of state, not an issue of religion Also see it as homosexual's freedom to enjoy the legitmacy and benefits (tax credits, pension, etc) heterosexuals have always enjoed Dissenters: view it as an issue of religion and morality. Their argument: if "loving" is enough, what if 1 man and 2 women..(or 10 women) honestly love each other? Can they get married if homosexuals can? 3."In God We Trust" That is on the US currency and in courtrooms However, here is one debate about freedom of religion: It has been argued that separation of church of state meant all branches of *Protestant* beliefs are treated equally. e.g. a Lutheran cannot decide that all Baptists are *wrong*. At most, that means members of major religions are treated equally, e.g. Jews and Catholics However, some would argue Atheists, Budhists..or even Muslims were not conceived as "legitmate" religions in the late 1700's. And since majority rules, and US is over 90% Christian, those "Fringe religions (or lack thereof)" simply mean immorality and should not be treated equally.
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-5 2:45:34编辑过] |