up! 459/. Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to a hotel. A. to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to B. that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to C. under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining them in D. that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in E. to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to In this sentence, members of the jury are presented with two options: they may (1) go home or (2) be confined to a hotel. The rejected motion would have allowed them to do the first rather than [to] suffer the second. Members of the jury must be the logical subject of both options, and both must be expressed in parallel form, that is, as infinitive clauses. E, the best choice, observes these requirements. In A and C, the phrase members of the jury is not the logical subject of the second option, to confine them or confining them, since jury members are not doing the confining. In B and D, confined and confinement are not infinitives and thus do not parallel to go in the first option.
问题1:。。denied a motion to allow。。 这个结构中,为什么不可以理解为 to allow是修饰 denied的,是表示denied的目的。 问题2:在A的表示结构中,如果先不考虑instead of的可行性,是否可以认为 a motion to allow members… instead of to confine them..也是一个平行结构? them 指代members. 意思是议案允许他们...,而不是限制他们..
我也有同样的疑问,请牛牛指点。 |