看看多少人被沃顿WAITLIST了

随便逛逛

以下是引用你带杯子了吗在2007-3-23 11:15:00的发言：

所以，那得多差才会被直接ding阿

不过是GT还是essay我都似乎没什么太差的啊，为啥呢，这是...

实在是很难接受

怎么这么说？！我就认识几个极优秀的被ding掉了~~ 被wharton ding了一样还是很优秀！巴菲特还被wharton ding掉呢！·！！

robinst

以下是引用ddtt在2007-3-23 10:22:00的发言：

我瞎猜的

1\ JUDITH大姐不如THOMAS那么欣赏/理解中国申请人,INTERVIEW的分数都偏低,导致大批的人被W/L -----very impossible since interivew is not the deciding factor.....but only one element in it....some proof: some had very awful interview got in, as shown on BW.

----Chinese applicants basically compete in the same pool....so as long as most in the same pool were interviewed by Judith, even she does not favor Chinese applicants, all are still on the same level to compete....not to mention many interviewed by alumni got WL too.

2\WHARTON对第三轮的申请人有着乐观的估计,但又拿不准 ---- not possible....this year the applicants are very competitive...plus, B-schools don't rely on 3rd round...that's too risky....Remember business is somehow about taking "smart" risk...surely counting on something unknown is not smart.

3\去年录取的中国学生的INTERNSHIP找的不好(瞎猜的,别拍我)影响指标,WHARTON准备减少中国学生的数量,但又拿不准第三轮的情况,所以先W/L着中国学生,----according to what i learnt from some current students, it's not the case. Even if they planned to reduce the total number, then they would not hv admitted so many in the 1st round....(a big gap between first and second round admit will harm their own claim that there is no difference to apply in either round.) 

4ROBINST说的那种情况

robinst

以下是引用ininininhwsd在2007-3-23 11:22:00的发言：

Did you count in those people who are holding the China passport and  had their interview in countries other than mainland China? I think it's gonna be more than 100.

no i didn't count those interviewed outside China.

robinst

以下是引用随便逛逛在2007-3-23 11:29:00的发言：

怎么这么说？！我就认识几个极优秀的被ding掉了~~ 被wharton ding了一样还是很优秀！巴菲特还被wharton ding掉呢！·！！

right....they didn't alway pick the best

ddtt

以下是引用robinst在2007-3-23 11:30:00的发言：

不太同意你的意见,不过不说了,呵呵,说什么都是自我安慰.

W/L就是W/L了,机会是很小啦

WHARTON认为FIT的应该都收了.

只有先ACCEPT其他学校的OFFER啦,乖乖交DEPOSIT去也.

wonderMBA

wharton oversea interviews for chinese nationality are definitely more than 10. so the total interviews for chinese applicants are surely more than 100.

according to wharton s2s, many people are WL this year, not only for chinese applicants. and a lot of them are WL for both R1 and R2.

for ROBINST's case, I also dont think so. as you can see very few chinese are admitted to harvard and stanford in R1.

look at the number of applicants who received interview invitations from harvard, standford and MIT in R2, it is also much less than previous years.

It shows that the top B-schools are controling the admission more tightly, especially for chinese applicants. I guess they may have more focus on the enroll rate(enrolled over total acceptance) this year. since chinese applicants tend to apply more schools and reject most offers, it may have bigger impact on us. and the further deduction is, the enroll rate may be factored into future major rankings or the schools are considering enroll rate as one of the major measurement for the school's attraction or reputation.

just my 2cents

robinst

以下是引用wonderMBA在2007-3-23 12:05:00的发言：

wharton oversea interviews for chinese nationality are definitely more than 10. so the total interviews for chinese applicants are surely more than 100.

according to wharton s2s, many people are WL this year, not only for chinese applicants. and a lot of them are WL for both R1 and R2.

for ROBINST's case, I also dont think so. as you can see very few chinese are admitted to harvard and stanford in R1.

look at the number of applicants who received interview invitations from harvard, standford and MIT in R2, it is also much less than previous years.

It shows that the top B-schools are controling the admission more tightly, especially for chinese applicants. I guess they may have more focus on the enroll rate(enrolled over total acceptance) this year. since chinese applicants tend to apply more schools and reject most offers, it may have bigger impact on us. and the further deduction is, the enroll rate may be factored into future major rankings or the schools are considering enroll rate as one of the major measurement for the school's attraction or reputation.

just my 2cents

8 for HBS in R1 and another 8 for Stanford in R1 from mainland China.....that's a lot (to me personally....)

I agree with the last statement of you. Yield rate is very critical to schools. That's one factor the Director of Adcom cares most...

my another 2cents

ddff

LS, the claim that "chinese applicants tend to apply more schools...." is not true. At my company ( i am in the US), many white apply to a handful of schools.

camelhill

very good post..insightful

nnii

以下是引用你带杯子了吗在2007-3-23 11:15:00的发言：

所以，那得多差才会被直接ding阿

不过是GT还是essay我都似乎没什么太差的啊，为啥呢，这是...

实在是很难接受

所以啊，学校WL还是ding，所用的逻辑都不是我们可以猜得到了

被它ding了也不能说自己多差，mm表哭了，看着伤心