ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950's, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8130|回复: 21
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD-8-41,还是不懂--马上要考了!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-2-15 10:42:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD-8-41,还是不懂--马上要考了!!!

When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.

 

  1. there are less than one-quarter that many

  2. there are fewer than one-quarter as many

  3. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount

  4. the number is less than one-quarter the amount

  5. it is less than one-quarter of that amount

我在C,D中犹豫,但最终选了D.因为C中的确there are  出现,所以排除了.

正确答案是C.

请问,D中the number 作为4000的同位语,为什么不选啊?

不是说同位语,形式是出题机构prefer的吗?

沙发
发表于 2007-2-15 11:00:00 | 只看该作者

是less 和few 的区别,

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-15 11:46:00 | 只看该作者

我知道 few 修饰可数名词.

less修饰不可数名词,这里less应该可以修饰number的.

所以请问,D是哪里有问题啊?

谢谢!

地板
发表于 2007-2-15 17:51:00 | 只看该作者

我想这里应该不存在同位语的说法, 连词but已经明示转折.  there are 在这里表示客观存在, 应该没有问题. 不知道这样解释对不对.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-16 10:16:00 | 只看该作者

现在我知道,当初同位语的看法是错误的.

可是,D的错误还是不知道啊?

请哪位指导一下.

看在明天都过年了,还在拼搏GMAT的份上....

6#
发表于 2007-2-16 10:59:00 | 只看该作者

似乎number不用less修饰的

似乎是用big和small

amount用more和less来修饰

另外number和amount似乎有点概念的不对等

7#
发表于 2007-3-22 03:02:00 | 只看该作者

It's D

some 4,000 doesnt denote a finite number ...it is uncountable => so it is an amount ... A, B out

In OG10-39. Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by
crossing a land bridge into North America.....  => so "less than one quarter of some 4000 drive-ins" is a correct usage

(Besides, "a number is less than or equal to XNOT "a number is fewer than or equal to X")

Left with CDE : C fewer than... amount => wrong ; E it => referent is unclear

Answer is definitely D

8#
发表于 2007-3-22 10:27:00 | 只看该作者

one-quarter the amount感觉不对 D还不如E好呢

BUT转折 应该形成前后对比  drive-ins were 与there are

there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount                that amount=4000(我直接想成than 1000了) 用fewer比 less更恰当 

以上三点是我刚看这题(遮了答案)时的思路  本人是菜鸟 也希望有牛人指点

楼上引用OG的比较 感觉两者有些差别  但是我也很菜也说不出来到底有什么差别....

 


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-22 10:29:55编辑过]
9#
发表于 2007-3-22 10:47:00 | 只看该作者

选 D.

The problems of other choices are highlighted below:

  1. there are (is) less than one-quarter that many

  2. there are fewer than one-quarter as many

  3. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount

  4. the number is less than one-quarter the amount

  5. it is less than one-quarter of that amount
10#
发表于 2007-3-22 11:16:00 | 只看该作者

看了楼上的解答 觉得but前面的主干应该是some 4,000 existed in the United States 而When 引导的drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950’s应该是某个成分(我也不知道该叫什么--!)

另 请教楼上 the number和it 为什么不可以用it 而且it比the number更简洁

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 03:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部