EG:3Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days. EG:4:28. The rise in the Commerce Department’s index of leading economic indicators suggest that the economy should continue its expansion into the coming months, but that the mixed performance of the index’s individual components indicates that economic growth will proceed at a more moderate pace than in the first quarter of this year. 再看上面两个例子,than前后的时态明显不同且有明确的表示时间的状语,虽然我们知道than后分别省略了比较的对象,但是按照开始两个例子的逻辑,OG认为当比较前后时间不同的时候一定要补出it was之类的相应动词。这好像是存在了自相矛盾的说法。折磨了很久,后来认为这差异之处在于,1和2都是主语的比较补出理所当然,但是在3和4中比较对像是状语中的名词,不是主语比较,当然不用补出动词,只需要把限定成份说出即可。 本以为这样的解释还算说得过去,可是又联系到以前以为弄懂的一个问题整个体系就又乱了。
|