ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Abbigail_law
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问prep 58,后天考,请NN务必帮忙啊

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2007-5-12 08:41:00 | 只看该作者

顶~~

呼唤nn~~

12#
发表于 2007-5-12 13:56:00 | 只看该作者

以下是引用Abbigail_law2007-1-3 17:16:00的发言:

58. Diesel engines burn as much as 30% less fuel than gasoline engines of comparable size, as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses that have been implicated in global warming.

A  of comparable size , as well as emitting far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses that have
B of comparable size, as well as emit far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses having
C of comparable size, and also they emit far fewer carbon dioxide and other gasses that have
D that have a comparable size, and also they emit far fewer of the other gasses having
E that have a comparable size, as well as emitting far fewer of the other gasses having

说下我的拙见DE不多说了,肯定要排除.

B的话emit不做伴随状态,也错

AC有少量区别.扎一眼看CA更加简洁些,合并了A中的2个修饰成分.

如果确实可以这么做,那么就应该选C.反之就是A

 

现在要读懂题目的意思,尤其是那几个细小的差别

Far less carbon dioxide gas, 更少的二氧化碳排放量

Far fewer of the other gases that…= Far fewer (gases) of the other gases that…

更少的能引起全球变暖的气体的(数目,或者理解成种类吧)

Fewer用来修饰可数名词,很显然不管什么气体,哪怕这里用了gases,那么排放的量也还是不可数的,应该用little.

但是这里用了fewer,可见这里的意思不是气体的体积,而是说gases可数的一个属性,那就是气体的种类.

你吧这点理解清楚,就能坚定的选择A


蓝色部分是总结中的注解。但是偶没有看懂。。。
在这个题目里面as well as做什么啊?
至于这个as well as,我不觉得可以当连词用,自己做的题目里面也都是不当连词用的,通常都是表示一个伴随的状态.

连词的话为什么后面要用emitting呢,跟原型burn as well as emit不是平行得很好的么?照你这么说,那为什么不吧as well as换成and 更简单明白
介词的话又怎么理解呢?

 还有就是far fewer of the other gasses,为什么要有 of 啊?
far fewer of the other gases
far fewer other gases 有什么不同么?
            

 
        
NN一定要帮忙,谢谢谢谢谢谢~~~~~!!

 

13#
发表于 2007-5-31 16:58:00 | 只看该作者
现在要读懂题目的意思,尤其是那几个细小的差别

Far less carbon dioxide gas, 更少的二氧化碳排放量

Far fewer of the other gases that…= Far fewer (gases) of the other gases that…

更少的能引起全球变暖的气体的(数目,或者理解成种类吧)

Fewer用来修饰可数名词,很显然不管什么气体,哪怕这里用了gases,那么排放的量也还是不可数的,应该用little.

但是这里用了fewer,可见这里的意思不是气体的体积,而是说gases可数的一个属性,那就是气体的种类.



对于LS的这点我表示不同.few 和little不是用来修饰排放量的.显然是修饰后面的名词气体啊!

C中修饰dioxide and other gases 而其中dioxide是不可数,所以不能用few.

A则弥补了此不足,用less和fewer分别修饰.

此题中as well as为介词,后接动名词表伴随

为什么不做连词与burn平行? 答:那样as well as前面就不用逗号了嘛!

而as well as这个词组确实是可以做连词的.

具体用法,大家可以参照http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/4b50b7fe010006n1 比较多呢,大家就自己点开去看吧

至于A中fewer 后为什么要加of...同问..

还请NN指点

UP~UP~

14#
发表于 2007-6-24 15:56:00 | 只看该作者

另一个问题:

记得dioxin可数,那么carbon dioxin为啥又不可数呢?

15#
发表于 2008-3-17 10:40:00 | 只看该作者

 far less carbon dioxide gas and far fewer of the other gasses

less不是修饰第一个gas, fewer修饰gasses,为什么第一个是不可数第二个是可数呢?

16#
发表于 2008-3-17 16:13:00 | 只看该作者

朗文字典里的:

few of :I've read a few of her books.

Very few of the staff come from the local area.Mr Wingate was full of explanations, but precious few (=hardly any) of them made sense.

对于二氧化碳,朗文里说是不可数

carbon dioxide:   [uncountable]
the gas produced when animals breathe out, when carbon is burned in air, or when animal or vegetable substances decay

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-1 20:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部