ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1115|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG11里关于对比的题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-11-19 09:56:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG11里关于对比的题

OG11 语法76题:

Never before had taxpayers confronted so many changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

A so many changes at once as they had in

B at once as many changes as

C at once as many changes that there were with

D as many changes at once as they confronted in

E so many changes at once that confronted them in

 

答案D

 

在解释B为什末不对时,OG a clause must follow as to complete the sentence.

 

可是在OG 75, as后面也没有跟句子啊,将省略的还原后,本句应为:

Salt deposits and moisture threaten to destroy the MD excavation in Pakistan, the site of an ancient civilization that flourished at the same time as the civilization (that flourished) in the Niledelta and the river valleys of the T and E. 这怎末解释?是as 后一定要跟句子,还是说the same as 例外?请指教

 

 

75 Salt deposits and moisture threaten to destroy the MD excavation in Pakistan, the site of an ancient civilization that flourished at the same time as the civilization in the Nile delta and the river valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates.

A that flourished at the same time as the civilizations

B that had flourished at the same time as had the civilizations

C that flourished at the same time those had

D flourishing at the same time as those did

E flourishing at the same time as those were

 

答案:A

 

 

 

沙发
发表于 2008-1-28 17:46:00 | 只看该作者
个人觉得,75题看平行结构比较容易解题。。。76么看懂意思。。。
板凳
发表于 2008-1-28 20:10:00 | 只看该作者

75题语法点

定语从句与分词短语作定语

that从句(关系分句)在所有后置修饰语中,它的表意功能最为明确.因为关系分句引导词(关系代词)指人或指物的选择使这种后置修饰语和它的修饰对象之间所指关系非常明确。同时,关系分句是限定分句,其谓语动词的形态也会使意义明白无误,可以避免其它后置修饰语在表意功能上的局限性。如:强调具体时间具体动作,以及动作的一次性。

分词短语(在句中),优先作后置定语修饰就近的名词。作名词的后置定语时常带有模糊性的原因所在。如:强调笼统不确定的时间,抽象/客观/重复性/多次性的行为。

(分词短语在句首可句尾时作状语,见《分词作状语》)两者都可以接受时,分词短语优于定语从句(因为更简洁),定语从句要尽量转换为分词短语(但不能引起歧义)(该区别常常不是区分正确与错误选项的死穴,通常有其它错误存在)定语从句包含情态动词时不能转化为分词短语-ing分词的完成时态不能充当名词的定语,必须转化为定语从句n.+ having doneàn. that…

地板
发表于 2008-1-29 01:24:00 | 只看该作者

你问对比的话,我就从比较对象的一致性方面来回答一下,呵呵

Never before had taxpayers confronted so many changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

A so many changes at once as they had in

B at once as many changes as

C at once as many changes that there were with

D as many changes at once as they confronted in

E so many changes at once that confronted them in

原文倒装,还原:taxpayers  never before confronted so many changes at once as they had in the...Act of 1986

我们强调比较对象要一致,并且要求要有可比性,比如我们不能拿长度和重量进行比较等等...

解释B的时候,其实想表达的意思是句子(主谓结构)应该比句子。

回过头来看B,confronted at once as many chages as ...Act of 1986, 不难看出这里是拿charges和act在比较...一个是费用,一个是法案,当然完全是没有可比性的...如果B的后面换成说是法案中规定的费用,那么b才能对

再看D,精简一下..不难发现比较对象是:taxpayer confronted as ... as they they confronted, as..as前后都是完整的主谓结构,并且表达的意思都是相同的,所以不论是结构上还是含义上,都是可以进行比较的,因而也就是正确答案了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-14 22:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部