OG11-50

nicholas_du

That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

为什么C不对呢？

crocoangel

d么？

lsw

up!

I need someone's help!

Thanks!

tonyyuan

up!!!

hru

the original meaning is saying that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of 1.educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology (original meaning) 

2.it it the fault of educators (after ignoring the restriction clause, you can consider the meaning again) 

so option C distort the original meaning.

Zeldaw

C有个问题，就是it 的指代

C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

这个it没有指代对象，因为这不是一个强调句，如果自强调句，应该是it is the fault that....或it is educators who

题目中强调的是fault但是用的是who

YY_lalala

同意LS

maydaythekid

以下是引用hru在2007-3-22 19:49:00的发言：

the original meaning is saying that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of 1.educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology (original meaning) 

2.it it the fault of educators (after ignoring the restriction clause, you can consider the meaning again) 

so option C distort the original meaning.

解释得好清晰啊，非常感谢！