ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 15835|回复: 46
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]885-01-24

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-19 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]885-01-24

885-01-24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.
(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during
(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in
(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over
(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply during
(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

What's wrong with (E)
还有,Even though 和 Although 的用法有什么不同 ?
沙发
发表于 2003-10-19 16:40:00 | 只看该作者
很明显时态错了啊    ,应该用现在时    因为是   for two decades
板凳
发表于 2003-11-16 22:16:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dc在2003-10-19 16:24:00的发言:
885-01-24. Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.
(A) Even though its per capita food supply hardly increased during
(B) Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in
(C) Despite its per capita food supply hardly increasing over
(D) Despite there being hardly any increase in its per capita food supply during
(E) Although there is hardly any increase in per capita food supply for

What's wrong with (E)

我本来也是选e,后来看了大侠的解释后,知道应该要用完成式;不过这里的a、b选项,会不会有修饰语误置的问题,也就是even though所带的句子好像变成修饰stringent rationing and planned的味道。请指教!
还有,Even though 和 Although 的用法有什么不同 ?
地板
发表于 2003-11-17 00:03:00 | 只看该作者
E:there be在gmat中很少用,往往表示自然存在;for two decades要用完城市
5#
发表于 2004-8-29 03:09:00 | 只看该作者

请解释一下为什么A 不对, 谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-29 3:21:32编辑过]
6#
发表于 2004-8-30 00:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用egretxm在2004-8-29 3:09:00的发言:

请解释一下为什么A 不对, 谢谢!

A的时态不对!既不符合该从句中现在完成时的时间标志词“during two decades”,也不跟主句中“have allowed”的时态一致!


7#
发表于 2004-11-4 11:24:00 | 只看该作者
这题做时很快选到E,因为主句主语是ration ang distribution, 从句its food supply好象会产生很明显的illogical referent, 还是因为主句主语是复数,所以可以消除模糊指代?
8#
发表于 2005-5-7 20:45:00 | 只看该作者
E的错误在于时态。B的its 是不是因为主句的主语和谓语的关系明确,且句末有“for its population”,这样就可以在从句中用its 指代PRC’s ?
9#
发表于 2005-5-28 23:18:00 | 只看该作者

同问上一楼的问题


AB 的its 和主句的主语无关么?


Even though its per capita food supply has hardly increased in two decades, stringent rationing and planned distribution have allowed the People’s Republic of China to ensure nutritional levels of 2,000 calories per person per day for its population.


我把its指rationing and distrbution 作为指代逻辑错误, 以及主句谓语have ...复数形式作为排除AB的依据了 : (

10#
发表于 2005-6-21 23:40:00 | 只看该作者

请教一下NN,B中的its应该指代谁呢?从逻辑上看应该是PRC。但是可以这样指代吗?不是说从句中的代词是优先指代主句主语的吗?这里的PRC是作了allow的宾语啊!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 05:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部