ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4637|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TT GWD2-3 求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-4 15:17:00 | 只看该作者

TT GWD2-3 求教

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

 

  1. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

  2. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
  3. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were[tc1] 
  4. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
  5. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

答案是C,为什么A不对?

沙发
发表于 2006-10-6 02:12:00 | 只看该作者

我也偏好Aㄟ....

板凳
发表于 2006-10-6 02:25:00 | 只看该作者

is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were

The answer should be C,

"Xu Ni Yu Qi" ,

(sorry, I  can not type Chinese on my school PC).

地板
发表于 2006-10-6 13:05:00 | 只看该作者

小弟請教一下

第一、為什麼要用"be" signed??

第二、就我對句意的理解,agreement是不是應該不是由investors簽的,應該是由Bank簽的,若是由investors簽的,那這句的邏輯豈不是有點怪,要我提出offer的先決條件是要我自己先簽一份同意我自己受罰的agreement!!

小弟淺見!!

5#
发表于 2006-10-6 17:30:00 | 只看该作者

表示与现在事实相反主句用would/should+V

从句用if+过去式,(be 用 were)

6#
发表于 2006-11-2 12:28:00 | 只看该作者

此题是有虚拟语气,但不是针对a merger agreement is signed 的,而是说if the deal were not to be concluded, the agreement should include a provision.

merger agreement 是否签,不是虚拟,而是投资者投资的条件,not one of sb. will do it untill sth. is done.

因此应该选A.

实际上我感觉GWD-2 verbal里的很多答案都是错的,比如第33题,竟然说each one of which are  doing sth.是对的!简直胡扯!

7#
发表于 2006-11-26 15:04:00 | 只看该作者

6楼的兄弟与我心有戚戚焉,33题的答案我认为是最后一个,句子最后用独立主格的那个选项;

而这个第3题,从虚拟语气的角度,这个叫条件虚拟,应该只有条件句用虚拟。

句子的意思好像很多人都没有读懂,我尝试翻译一下:

没有投资者会提出来购买FIB这家银行,除非一份[包含(如果交易达不成就要惩罚FIB银行)的条款的]并购协议被签署。

所以从逻辑意思上来讲,只有A选项正确。

这个题的考点:

1、不定式: make an offer to;

2、虚拟语气中的条件虚拟(这是本题的难点,很少有题目考条件虚拟,大家可以看一下薄冰的语法书);

但实际上即使不知道条件虚拟,这个题目根据逻辑意思也能够选出A选项。

正如4楼的cafe所说:

“agreement是不是應該不是由investors簽的,應該是由Bank簽的,若是由investors簽的,那這句的邏輯豈不是有點怪,要我提出offer的先決條件是要我自己先簽一份同意我自己受罰的agreement!!”

大家继续讨论。

8#
发表于 2007-1-2 04:15:00 | 只看该作者
Alan Liu is correct
9#
发表于 2007-5-2 12:35:00 | 只看该作者
d
10#
发表于 2008-12-11 22:53:00 | 只看该作者
争议题  我选A
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-5 01:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部