ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2612|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助11th黄皮OG50这道题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-27 00:06:00 | 只看该作者

求助11th黄皮OG50这道题

50. That educators have not anticipated the impact
            of microcomputer technology can hardly be
            said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not
even mention microcomputers in
            
Future Shock, published in 1970.

(A)         That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault

(B)         That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault

(C)        It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology

(D)        It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology

(E)         The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said

我不太懂为什么a错了,og的解释是the main verb is both preceded and followed by a subordinate clause,可是这样不行吗?

有点晕~~~~~~

沙发
发表于 2006-9-27 00:17:00 | 只看该作者

That educators that have not anticipated the impact
            of microcomputer technology can hardly be
            said that it is their fault:

that不能省

板凳
发表于 2006-9-27 00:22:00 | 只看该作者
这到题我也对A的解释不明白,但前面的解释里很明显又是GMAC的偏向原则:“Although it is  possible to begin a sentence with a subordinate clause beginning with "that",this inverted construction often results in errors”
地板
发表于 2006-9-27 10:49:00 | 只看该作者

I think it's wordy and redundant

5#
发表于 2008-4-6 00:33:00 | 只看该作者

我不是很理解C为什么不对,看句意表达得也非常清楚。怎样能排除它呢?

谢谢~~

6#
发表于 2008-4-6 07:58:00 | 只看该作者
A头重脚轻太严重了,GMAT不喜欢这样的表达
7#
发表于 2008-4-6 10:23:00 | 只看该作者

我也有些晕,确实是头重脚轻,

但是 OG的解释我没有太懂“In original sentence,the subordinate clause that ... techniue is followed by the main verb, can...be said, but then the verb is followed by yet another subordinate clasue, that it is their fault." 是说这个只是不是习惯表达,还是具体有错误,错在哪里呢?

我认为,C和D的意思不同,D和原文表达的意思相同

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 02:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部