TTGWD29-19显然指代有歧义啊啊啊啊,为什么是这样

ad264

    

D应该是if (students are) recognized and applied, 解为被动没错。

    

似乎就算主动，也不会用过去式吧，应改为分词recognizing

llxx1985cn

明白了~~，偶以前太死抠定义了~~

lichabrend

up

NOTALOSER

对，问题主要还是在recognized和applied的主动和被动问题上，这里的D选项，无论从逻辑上讲究竟是主动还是被动，都会造成歧义，为了明确究竟是主动还是被动，E才是真正的正确选项，虽然看起来有点redundant

queenie0308

they E选项中theY指代谁啊啊啊

yzhao26

up

bluebus0831

up

dennis1006

up

myloveavril

D为什么不是 that if (skills are) recognized and applied, students...的省略形式呢？

daisyao

以下是引用myloveavril在2009/7/15 15:39:00的发言：
D为什么不是 that if (skills are) recognized and applied, students...的省略形式呢？

如果是这样的话~句子结构是否就改变了呢？

Critical-thinking instruction is predicted on two assumptions: 
                    that there are clearly identifiable thinking skills
                that students can be taught to recognize and apply appropriately, and that if recognized and applied, students will become more effective thinkers.

变成students 与(skills are) recognized and applied对称了吧？而且逻辑是two assumptions~所以也不对啊~

况且这里省略了主语和宾语，会造成歧义吧~