og25现在分词和过去分词

psemmead

25. The end of the eighteenth century saw the emergence of prize-stock breeding, with individual bulls and cows receiving awards, fetching unprecedented prices, and excited enormous interest whenever they were put on show.

     

      (A)   excited
 

      (B)   it excited

      (C)   exciting

 

      (D)  would excite
     

      (E)   it had excited

Choice C is best. The third verb phrase in the series describing bulls and cows should have the same grammatical form as the first two. Only choice C has a present participle (or "-ing" form) that is parallel with the two preceding verbs, receiving and fetching. Instead of the present participle, choices A and B use the past tense (excited), choice D uses an auxiliary verb (would excite), and choice E uses the past perfect tense (had excited). Additionally, the incorrect verb tenses in B and E are introduced by a pronoun, it, that lacks a logical noun referent.

查了下好像没人讨论过，还是我已从根本上错了？og 上说A 错是因为时态错误，可我理解得excited 是过去分词。不是说现在分词和过去分词可以并列，用哪个取决于主语是动作发出者还是承受者吗？bulls and cows
                        不就是excit的承受者吗，为什么不用excited，而用exciting 呢，急等回复，谢谢啦

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-3 11:10:20编辑过]

mbz

以下是引用psemmead在2006-8-3 10:58:00的发言：

og 上说A 错是因为时态错误，可我理解得excited 是过去分词。不是说现在分词和过去分词可以并列，用哪个取决于主语是动作发出者还是承受者吗？bulls and cows
      不就是excit的承受者吗，为什么不用excited，而用exciting 呢，急等回复，谢谢啦

og 上说A 错是因为时态错误，可我理解得excited 是过去分词。不是说现在分词和过去分词可以并列，用哪个取决于主语是动作发出者还是承受者吗？bulls and cows
      不就是excit的承受者吗，为什么不用excited，而用exciting 呢，急等回复，谢谢啦

bulls and cows
      不是excit的承受者,而是动作发出者

psemmead

谢谢，可是为什么呢？bulls and cows不是被感兴趣吗？还是不太明白，好像突然之间晕掉了

mbz

the animals make people feel excited.

psemmead

啊，明白了，自己把自己搞晕了，mbz谢谢了阿