D has three problems,
1/ recieve ==> recieved,
2/ consistent and unqualified ==> the consistent and unqualified
3/ support by ==> support of
举报
i always feel it should be support for....
and always ignore that "sb's doing " .....
Is it a definite mistake?
you can support for sth, and get the support of sb....
a different use between noun and verb.
in english, no such expression as unqualifying
always unqualified
how about sb's doing....--I mean the structure....is normally wrong....it seems to me......
the use of V-ing as a noun...already depends; and it seems to me the use of sb's doing is almost impossible........this one can be eliminated instantly.....
but haven't find proof yet.........
发表回复
手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 04:02 京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
ChaseDream 论坛
© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.