let me try...
以下是引用smilinglan在2003-4-5 15:22:00的发言: 新东方补充材料,谢谢大家帮助!感激不尽! 154 In 1933 the rubber,clothing,and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,(believing it a seeming perment accomodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was )an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.
C believing it a was not a temporary expendient but a seeming perment accomodation to what many observers thought of as a
D not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accomodation to what many observers thought was 答案是D 我的疑问: 1,C中如果将seeming 改成seemingly 是不是也是正确答案了呢?
1. believing没有逻辑主语。 2. 分词短语,一般: a.伴随结果,不合适。 b.伴随动作,beliving 应该不是一个动作。
2,D中的what many observers thought was 的结构是怎么样的呢?不知道这里做的什么意思,看来是我对what 用法不熟悉,尤其是这里的was 也不知道为何放在这里。
理论而言,应该是以was作谓语的定语从句(嵌套一个小主语从句),修饰expedient. 整理如下: not as a temporary expedient what many observers thought was but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to an economy made over productive by advances in technology. 整个not as后面的句子,作为6-hour workday的同位语。这也是为什么into effect提前的原因。
158 Although it claim to delve into political issues,television can be (superfical such as when each of the three major networks )broadcast exactly the same statement from a political candidate.
C superfical if the three major networks all
E superfical,as when the three major networks each 答案是E ,我不明白这里as 是做什么用的呢?另外C为什么不对呢?
这句考的是such as 和as 用法上的分别。
such as举例,后面不可跟when从句(白勇的理论)。但是在这道题里,需要这么一个例子来证明television can be superficial。怎么办?用as引导。as作为副词,表“就像,比如”。同样的例子:as above, as before, as usual, as well.
as当然可以作代词,但如白勇所说指代前面整个句子实在费解。更何况,如此的话,as在分句里做什么成份成了问题。
157 Temporary-employment agencies benefit not only from the increasing demand for clerical workers but also (the higer profits made when highly paid professionals are placed ,requests for whom )have increased in the recent wave of corporate takeovers. C from the requests for highly paid professionals ,who make higher profits for the agencies when placed and whose requests D form highly paid professionals,whose placement makes higher profits for the agencies and whose requests E form the higher profits made in placing highly paid professionals,request for whom 答案是E
我搞不清楚这个机构是怎么获利的呢?与not only from 并列的为什么是but also from the higher profits,这个地方我不懂。另外想问一下:E中的request for whom 做什么呢?是不是就相当与highly paid professionals's request 呢?谢谢大家帮我看看!
1. 从request和专家身上获利似更不可理解。怎么获利的不用去管,直到利润可以带给他们benefit就好。有点像逻辑,不能多想,说啥信啥即可。 2. not only from ... but also from... 对仗工整,有何不妥? 3. requests for who做定语从句,修饰professionals:对这种高薪专家的需求增长了...... |