gwd26-20

missilezy

选E的能说一下 that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997的是做什么成分？伴随行动状语？还是什么独立主格？

sch

E后面是 fragment.

that figure本身也不是前面的同位语.所以E肯定错/

有人给说说为啥C错了么?

klhyy

c

xiaoda

up

水里游

up

bluebus0831

up

tiffany1102

UP.

VeniceBingo

c是不是错在spend不能用被动?

gerrard

c.whereas nearly six hours a week were
  spent in 1997

b. by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
   six hours a week

d.  chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

c没有语法错误，但是不能表达出完成时态，即也许1996时数字不变，1997这一年突然增加的；并且才C的被动语态导致其表达不精准，又WHEREAS 连接两个完整的句子，6 HOURS WERE SPENT 不知道是用在什么上面了。被动语态也改变了句子重心。就像管大侠说的，语法题不一定都有语法错误，商业英文比较的是精准表达.

d句尾过去分词前面不管有无逗号，都是修饰紧邻前面的名词，不能跳跃修饰

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/15 0:39:14编辑过]

lmiltamy

[quote]
c.whereas nearly six hours a week were
spent in 1997
b. by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
six hours a week
d. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

c没有语法错误，但是不能表达出完成时态，即也许1996时数字不变，1997这一年突然增加的；并且才C的被动语态导致其表达不精准，又WHEREAS 连接两个完整的句子，6 HOURS WERE SPENT 不知道是用在什么上面了。被动语态也改变了句子重心。就像管大侠说的，语法题不一定都有语法错误，商业英文比较的是精准表达.
d句尾过去分词前面不管有无逗号，都是修饰紧邻前面的名词，不能跳跃修饰

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/15 0:39:14编辑过]

-- by 会员 gerrard (2009/10/15 0:22:00)

[/quote
i am so confused. please help!!

ed句尾过去分词前面不管有无逗号，都是修饰紧邻前面的名词，不能跳跃修饰

名词,ing 分词"这种情况多数是分词结构修饰前面一个句子, 只有在特定的语境下,分词才修饰前面的名词. 如果名词后面没有逗号,直接加分词,分词是修饰这个名词的.

求這二句話的不同!!
謝謝