ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: trictincy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-26-17

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-11-12 14:04:00 | 只看该作者
likelihood与may重复 这个没问题吧? may必须删除
12#
发表于 2006-12-11 22:09:00 | 只看该作者

e

A.    a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood

that a particular asteroid or comet may

B.     a scale that astronomers have developed rates how

likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to

C.     astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely

a particular asteroid or comet will be to (重复)

D.    astronomers have developed a scale for rating the

likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will

E.     astronomers have developed a scale that rates the

likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-11 22:12:36编辑过]
13#
发表于 2006-12-15 21:16:00 | 只看该作者

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth;

 

Comets - News - Science - The New York Times - [ 翻译此页 BETA ]
            

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth; new scale described ...
topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/comets/index.html?offset=50& - 52k -

vote for D!!!!!

14#
发表于 2007-1-20 10:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用itokinblue在2006-12-15 21:16:00的发言:

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth;

 

Comets - News - Science - The New York Times - [ 翻译此页 BETA ]
   

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth; new scale described ...
topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/comets/index.html?offset=50& - 52k -

vote for D!!!!!

这个好像没有解决D中developed a scale for rating the likelihood 的问题吧

15#
发表于 2007-1-20 10:47:00 | 只看该作者

这题本来选C的,觉得是will be likely to的结构,但是google上搜了一下,似乎只有以下2种用法:

1. will+likely+v. 的用法,

2. how likely + is/are +to do的用法

也就是说很少出现how likely + will be to do的用法,从这点来说,C的将来时+to do似乎有重复之嫌

E中likelihood that may...的用法不对

D中又出现一个have developed a scale for rating ,似乎也很少出现在正确选项中

 

 


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-1-20 10:54:58编辑过]
16#
发表于 2007-1-23 11:59:00 | 只看该作者

这道题我选择的是D,但是看了答案后觉得应该选择C

我的理由是:这里的WILL BE TO并不是一个结构,不是表示将来的BE TO,因为how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to其实应该是 will be (to +后面的collide)可以理解为will be 是表示前面的asteroid或者comet的状态,而后面的to应该和will be分开

还请NN们指点迷津啊。。。

 

17#
发表于 2007-1-30 13:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zack_wong在2007-1-23 11:59:00的发言:

这道题我选择的是D,但是看了答案后觉得应该选择C

我的理由是:这里的WILL BE TO并不是一个结构,不是表示将来的BE TO,因为how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to其实应该是 will be (to +后面的collide)可以理解为will be 是表示前面的asteroid或者comet的状态,而后面的to应该和will be分开

还请NN们指点迷津啊。。。

 

按照这样的意思,我认为 how likely a particular asteroid or comet will collide ...是更好的表达方式

18#
发表于 2007-2-18 14:59:00 | 只看该作者

本来无法理解will be to所以选了E。但现在明白了,是will be likely to的省略。那么C就没有什么可争议的了。

19#
发表于 2007-10-7 16:33:00 | 只看该作者
我记得白勇上说好象GMAC不倾向使用 for doing 这样的表达,除此以外我找不出让我觉得D错的理由.这么说的话还是C比较好.而且C读起来比较顺~~
20#
发表于 2008-9-14 18:10:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得 题目的意思是 计算出可能性 rate the likelihood  改成 rate how likely it will be 总觉得改变了句意啊 我觉得 E比较好 除了 MAY 和 LIKELIHOOD 语意重复  

C的 BE TO 也没有错

 astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
        
a particular asteroid or comet will be to 其实是 be likely to do 的固定搭配 的 BE

不是别的意思

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 16:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部