ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3885|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 2-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-6-2 16:01:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 2-3

3. Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.

 

  1. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
  2. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
  3. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
  4. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
  5. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

   Answer: C

我想问这题答案为什么是C,首先后面的 the deal 为什么跟着 were 而不是 was,还有 be signed 为什么是正确答案而不是 is signed 或者如 B 答案一样。请各位指教!

沙发
发表于 2006-6-3 06:58:00 | 只看该作者

一开始在A.C之间选,但对最后were却不理解,是否改为was?

板凳
发表于 2006-6-3 07:22:00 | 只看该作者

were是虚拟,

但我也不知道为什么until里要用be signed,

地板
发表于 2006-6-3 23:33:00 | 只看该作者

我坚信此题选A,that includes a provision作定语修饰agreement,由于该部分太长,直接置于被修饰词之后会导致句子失去中心,所以将谓语部分提前,所以A是完全符合语法规则的

C中的被动态不好,而且就算用被动态也应该是an agreement is assigned

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-5 21:15:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢 ellegirl,原来是unreal situation。我忘了!
6#
发表于 2006-9-11 19:03:00 | 只看该作者
支持trictincy, 选A
7#
发表于 2007-8-14 16:36:00 | 只看该作者

看来这道题目cd上争议很大,我本来也是选A的,可是想了很久,突然想问问nn们,在until开头的句子中,好像没出现过什么should、would之类的吧?

如果if条件从句表示与现在的事实不符,谓语动词应该用过去时,be动词一律用were,而主句应该用would(第二三人称),那么这里会不会是在be前面省略了would?

8#
发表于 2007-10-8 08:35:00 | 只看该作者

有没有牛牛来解释一下,机井中遇到了这道题!

9#
发表于 2007-10-8 14:45:00 | 只看该作者
 if 引导的虚拟语气用were;很多人都选A阿,觉得C中的by them,them指代不是很清楚啊!
10#
发表于 2007-10-24 18:06:00 | 只看该作者

强烈支持A,这句话最后的were是表示虚拟语气不错,但这是针对penalties而言的,也就是说"if the deal were not to be concluded"这句话的主句就是penalties这一词,与前面的until无关.
前面的"Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed"已经很完整,且该句中无需用虚拟语气.

整个句子的结构是: 主句+until从句+含有虚拟语气的定语从句.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 20:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部