[求助]GWD26－17,这套问题挺多的

jiaxuan

个人也觉得C的说法有点怪,因为如果按照上述讨论,C的正常语序是a particular asteroid or comet will be likely to....这里这个will be就很别扭,如果是are还好些,因为我觉得will和likely有点意思差不多的嫌疑

findjuhl

倾向选C

D的for rating表示目的，是典型错误，应该用to rate替换

C的likely被提前，没有错误。

马尔代夫

D

andy_rds

我在做题的时候也选的D, 不过分析了一下觉得还是倾向于 C

如果 D 改成如下, 那肯定选D
astronomers have developed a scale to rate the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth.

C 其实从语法的角度来讲没有问题，正如二郎神说的
正常语序为a particular asteroid or comet will be  likely to collide with Earth. 这里作为从句则变成答案 C
astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to collide with Earth

Cafe

有沒有人覺得C的句意上會不會有點奇怪

感覺C的意思好像是"只"去rate how likely "a particular asteroid or comet" will be to.......

好像只針對某一個似的!!

(還是我的錯覺，看半天看不出所以然來，有點暈了)

dcatcher

我也倾向C, C中的说法好像没什么问题, to rate...在这里做developed a scale的目的状语. 但D中的for rating是致命伤,目的状语不用for doing sth.的形式表达. NY TIMES中的例句是that引导的定语从句,与D中的for rating有本质的不同. 希望大家多讨论指正.

111cara

我想问一下,may这种情态词可以省略或者替换吗

或者是因为这里的may与likelihood重复了?

超级菜鸟提问!!

 

linda816

恩，我也觉得C应该是正确的。

smileday

in C, the sentence should be modified into " a particular asteroid or comet will (be to ) collide with Earth.", at the same time, without changing the meaning of the sentence.

"be to" is unnecessary here.

so, D is best.

xiangqinzh

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth;

Comets - News - Science - The New York Times - [ 翻译此页 BETA ]
   

Astronomers, to help deal with public fascination, and sometimes undue alarm, about possible threats from asteroids, devise scale that rates likelihood that particular asteroid or comet will collide with Earth; new scale described ... topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/comets/index.html?offset=50& - 52k -

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-25 21:20:19编辑过]